O novo sistema de votação do American Idol está causando confusão em massa

ídolo americano introduziu uma nova maneira de os espectadores votarem em seus concorrentes favoritos – mas o sistema causou extremo mal-entendido e frustração entre os fãs.

A longa série de competição de canto, atualmente em sua 24ª temporada, adicionou recentemente “votação social”, permitindo que os fãs votassem comentando o nome de seu concorrente preferido no posto de votação fixado naquela noite no web site oficial. ídolo americano contas no Fb, TikTok e Instagram.

A votação social substituiu o dedicado ídolo americano aplicativo de votação, que foi descontinuado antes da nova temporada. Os espectadores ainda podem votar por texto e on-line no ídolo americano web site, embora a votação social pareça ser o método preferido, já que muitas vezes é a primeira opção apresentada aos fãs.

Para participar da votação social, os espectadores devem “deixar um comentário abaixo [the pinned voting post] isso inclui o primeiro nome escrito corretamente em quem você está votando.” Cada fã está limitado a ten votos por finalista e poderá enviar apenas um nome por comentário. Um vídeo explicativo compartilhado em ídolo americanoA página oficial do Fb no mês passado também observou que apenas os comentários são contados, não as respostas.

Embora possa parecer bastante simples, deixou muitas pessoas confusas.

'American Idol' introduziu uma nova forma de votação nas redes sociais que muitos fãs consideraram frustrante e confusa
‘American Idol’ introduziu uma nova forma de votação nas redes sociais que muitos fãs consideraram frustrante e confusa (Disney)

“Fica um pouco bagunçado”, de longa information ídolo americano fã Alex Rockwell disse Pedra rolando do voto social. “As regras não eram claras, mas ao mesmo tempo eram muito específicas.

“Um simples erro de digitação ou uma carta further pode fazer com que o voto não conte, e sei que as pessoas teriam dificuldade em encontrar em qual postagem votar”, explicou ela.

Rockwell questionou a necessidade de implementar um novo sistema de votação. “Pelo menos quando você envia uma mensagem para ‘21523’ e envia uma mensagem para o número [of the contestant you’re voting for]você recebe uma mensagem dizendo que votou”, disse ela. “Com as redes sociais, você está enviando isso para o vazio. Pode haver pessoas que pensam que estão votando, mas na verdade não estão fazendo isso direito.”

Outros repetiram reclamações semelhantes no Reddit, incluindo uma pessoa que compartilhou uma captura de tela de um comentário crítico nas redes sociais deixado em uma das postagens de votação. “Makiya parece que está gritando”, dizia o comentário – completo com o nome do competidor digitado incorretamente – ao qual o ídolo americano conta respondeu: “Isso conta como um voto para Makiyah!”

Logotipo da Apple TV+

Assista Apple TV+ gratuitamente por 7 dias

Somente novos assinantes. £ 9,99/mês. após teste gratuito. Planeje renovações automáticas até serem canceladas.

Experimente gratuitamente

ANÚNCIO. Se você se inscrever neste serviço, ganharemos comissão. Esta receita ajuda a financiar o jornalismo no The Unbiased.

Logotipo da Apple TV+

Assista Apple TV+ gratuitamente por 7 dias

Somente novos assinantes. £ 9,99/mês. após teste gratuito. Planeje renovações automáticas até serem canceladas.

Experimente gratuitamente

ANÚNCIO. Se você se inscrever neste serviço, ganharemos comissão. Esta receita ajuda a financiar o jornalismo no The Unbiased.

“Se isso não prova o fracasso absoluto da votação nas redes sociais, não sei o que prova”, argumentou o usuário do Reddit. “90 por cento dessas pessoas não seguem as regras.”

Várias pessoas responderam no tópico do Reddit, chamando a troca de “hilária”.

Lionel Richie, Carrie Underwood e Luke Bryan retornaram ao painel de jurados da 24ª temporada
Lionel Richie, Carrie Underwood e Luke Bryan retornaram ao painel de jurados da 24ª temporada (Getty)

“Eu ri tanto disso”, comentou um, com um segundo acrescentando: “Especialmente porque o bot escreveu o nome dela corretamente”.

“ESTE. MÉTODO. DE. VOTAÇÃO. É. UM. S***. SHOW”, um terceiro insistiu, enquanto um quarto concordou: “Uma bagunça completa, por que eles fariam isso?”

O Independente entrou em contato com a controladora da ABC, a Disney, para comentar.

Temporada 24 de ídolo americano viu o retorno de Carrie Underwood, Lionel Richie e Luke Bryan ao painel de jurados. No momento, restam cinco concorrentes: Hannah Harper, Jordan McCullough, Keyla Richardson, Braden Rumfelt e Chris Tungseth.

O vencedor será coroado durante o last da temporada, que vai ao ar em 11 de maio às 20h (horário do leste dos EUA) na ABC.

More and more young people are feeling hopeless

Angela Rayner has said a growing number of young people in Britain have been left feeling hopeless about their futures, in what will be interpreted as a warning to Sir Keir Starmer.

The former deputy prime minister, who is reported to being weighing up a direct challenge to Starmer’s leadership after next week’s local elections, has said in an exclusive interview that “more and more young people are feeling there isn’t an investment in their future now”.

Rayner spoke of the challenges facing Generation Z – those born between 1997 and 2012 – taking the rare step of talking about how her own son has been forced to borrow money in order to afford dental treatment.

Shorts – Quick stories

Rayner said: “That whole generation at the moment feels, no matter how much you run on the treadmill, you are not going to make it.”

She said that the psychological impact of feeling that homeownership is out of reach and being in permanent debt makes people feel “that they are pushed down, punched down” and is “holding the nation back”

“They are in this trap of poverty, a system that feels rigged against them and they feel that nothing changes for them,” Rayner added.

“That’s why I’m always trying to fight for them because I believe politics does change people’s lives. It changed my life. It doesn’t happen overnight, but it does make a difference.

“But actually being part of that delivery of change, I think will make a huge difference. It will make a difference to the confidence of the economy. It will make a difference to the psychology of the nation.”

CAMBRIDGESHIRE, ENGLAND - DECEMBER 12: Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner make a visit to a construction site on December 12, 2024 in Cambridgeshire, England. The Labour government is announcing planning reforms to encourage economic growth and meet the government's goal of building 1.5 million new homes over the next five years. (Photo by Chris Radburn - Pool/Getty Images)
Caption: Rayner is reported to be weighing up a challenge to Sir Keir Starmer’s leadership (Photo: Getty Images)

Her comments will be interpreted as another challenge to the Prime Minister over the direction of his government ahead of what are expected to be devastating local election results when millions vote in England, and for devolved governments in Scotland and Wales, next Thursday.

Labour is braced to lose thousands of seats, and there is speculation that Sir Keir Starmer – if he survives as Prime Minister – will need to launch a cabinet reshuffle in order to shore up his position.

Rayner, who commands strong support among the soft left of the party and its MPs, has publicly backed the Prime Minister at several crucial points since her resignation, and is expected to shortly be free for a return to Cabinet when HMRC concludes its investigation into her tax affairs.

She is understood to be undecided about a return to cabinet, regarding the direction of the government an important factor in her decision. Rayner may also launch a leadership challenge if it becomes clear that Starmer cannot survive.

In March, Rayner ignited leadership speculation by claiming in a speech that the government was “running out of time”.

She said then: “The very survival of the Labour Party is at stake – as a party and a movement we cannot hide, we cannot go through the motions in the face of decline. We are running out of time.”

Rayner’s comments on young people are part of the new Rest Is Politics podcast series about the struggles faced by Gen Z in Britain today.

The former housing secretary was forced to resign over tax affairs relating to stamp duty last September, but it is understood Starmer wants to find a way to bring Rayner back into his Cabinet as speculation grows of a potential leadership challenge.

Rayner said during her time in the Cabinet she been able to push through legislation which, she says, was aimed at supporting young adults: the Renters’ Rights Act, the Employment Rights Act and the forthcoming Leasehold and Commonhold Bill. She also championed giving 16-year-olds the right to vote.

“I want young people to look at the things that I was doing in government and say, she’s fighting for me and she gets it because they know things are difficult,” Rayner added.

In the interview, part of the four-part series called The Gen Z Story, Rayner spoke about the risks of politicians ignoring young adults who are currently locked out of homeownership, repaying hefty student loans and dealing with a job market where there are fewer opportunities for young people.

It comes as the cost of the average home has risen to more than eight times the annual salary, while the average graduate now faces debts of around £50,000 after leaving university.

Rayner, who is the mother of Gen Z children as well as a grandmother, said she had to be a guarantor for her 29-year-old son’s tenancy so he could afford to rent a home for his young family.

She said: “He’s got no opportunity at the moment to buy a property. He works really long hours. He provides for his family. He’s on a very low income. It’s really difficult for him.

“He had a problem with his teeth. He had to ask me to borrow to get his teeth done. He was in a hell of a lot of pain. He’s trying to work. He’s trying to raise his family. He can’t even afford a dentist.”

Rayner has previously tried to avoid sharing private details about her family, but took the unusual step of providing an insight into her life as a mother and grandmother.

She said: “It’s the psychology of my son having to come to me when he’s working, when he’s an absolutely brilliant dad, he’s looking after his family, but the psychology of him having to come to his mum or ask somebody else for help, that’s not a system that we should be enduring at the moment.

“That is not a system that Gen Z should have to accept because I think that [it has] a long drag on the economy, I think [it has] a long drag on our wellbeing as a country.”

Since resigning, Rayner has made relatively few public comments. She said she had chosen to speak about Gen Z because: “They [Gen Z] are our future. I’ve got skin in the game; I’ve got three of them at home. They need to feel that politics is for them. I go round schools and colleges all the time – the frustration for me is, they feel that no matter how hard they try, they can’t change the system.”

  • The first episode of the four-part series, The Gen Z Story, is introduced by Alastair Campbell and presented by The i Paper’s Housing and Society Correspondent, Vicky Spratt. It will be available on The Rest Is Politics feed on Friday, 1 May. The episode featuring Angela Rayner will be released later in the series.

Bob Olinger desiste com triunfo em Punchestown

Bob Olinger voltou no tempo para conquistar o Ladbrokes Champion Stayers Hurdle em Punchestown no início closing de sua longa e brilhante carreira.

Foi Teahupoo, de Gordon Elliott, quem foi expulso como favorito em 5/4 – buscando vencer a prova de três milhas pelo terceiro ano consecutivo – e liderou o campo até o voo closing.

No entanto, o forte de Henry de Bromhead estava ganhando terreno a cada segundo e enquanto os dois contendores de propriedade de Robcour saltavam o último em uníssono, foi o segundo favorito de 4/1 que pousou cheio de corrida com Teahupoo começando a murchar.

Jimmy Du Seuil, de Willie Mullins, estava terminando rápido e ultrapassou Teahupoo para o segundo lugar, mas não conseguiu diminuir a diferença de três quartos de distância para Bob Olinger, que aos 11 anos registrava sua 11ª vitória, sem falar que deu ao jóquei Darragh O’Keeffe uma tripla no dia.

É o ato closing de uma carreira que proporcionou conexões com muitos dias memoráveis, vencendo três vezes no Competition de Cheltenham – Ballymore Novices’ Hurdle, Turners Novices’ Chase e finalmente Stayers’ Hurdle, todos em uníssono com Rachael Blackmore.

“Ele leu o roteiro com gratidão; ele foi brilhante e Darragh foi brilhante com ele. Que cavalo para se ter”, disse De Bromhead. “Ele nos deu tantos dias incríveis.

“Ele tem um equipamento e é pura classe, sempre foi.

“Davy Roche, meu assistente, disse que ele é o melhor cavalo que já passou por nossa casa. Essa é uma grande afirmação e ele provavelmente é um pouco tendencioso porque o adora, ele é como seu segundo filho.

“Estou muito feliz por todos em casa, obviamente os Achesons e Darragh, que dia ele teve. Ele é um piloto de classe e deu-lhe uma corrida brilhante.

“É muito especial, é um dos melhores. Ele sair assim é o que ele merece, é típico dele.

“Tivemos anos incríveis com ele. Brian (Acheson) me ligou outro dia para dizer que period isso que ele estava planejando fazer e eu apenas disse ‘acerto, perfeito’.

“Tivemos muita sorte de fazer parte da história dele. Rachael venceu o Stayers ‘Hurdle com ele, no ano da cobiça em que ele venceu o Ballymore, que carona ela deu a ele.

“Aí o perdemos um pouco, mas Ger Kelly (veterinário) em Fethard foi brilhante e encontrou o problema. Ele voltou para Robbie’s (Energy) e voltou com um cavalo diferente, o mesmo de antes.

“Este é um dia que você saboreia, apenas um dia especial. Você sonha que eles podem terminar assim, mas muitas vezes isso não acontece. Vê-lo sair assim é simplesmente fenomenal.”

Cobden e Salvator Mundi aproveitam ao máximo a queda de Kopek Des Bordes

Harry Cobden se preparou para seu novo emprego como jóquei contratado de JP McManus, aproveitando o closing da queda de Kopek Des Bordes a bordo de Salvator Mundi no Barberstown Fortress Novice Chase.

O jogador de 27 anos deve começar sua nova função com o verde e o dourado na sexta-feira, mas como quando marcou a bordo do Kitzbuhel no Competition de Cheltenham, ele usava o amarelo e o preto de Joe e Marie Donnelly a bordo do 13/2 probability, que foi visto pela última vez terminando em segundo lugar na companhia de primeiro grau em Aintree.

Foi Kopek Des Bordes, vice-campeão de Arkle, dirigido por Paul Townend, que foi expulso como favorito em 4/11 para terminar a temporada em alta e parecia ter a corrida à sua mercê, tendo viajado poderosamente para a liderança ao cair dois fora.

No entanto, para crédito de Salvator Mundi, ele sempre manteve o controle da cauda do casaco de seu companheiro de estábulo e, depois de ficar com uma pequena vantagem após a queda de Kopek Des Bordes, ele foi capaz de galopar para uma vitória de 12 distâncias sobre o Irish Panther e fornecer Mullins com uma 11ª vitória consecutiva na competição de duas milhas.

Imagem:
Salvator Mundi, montado por Harry Cobden, a caminho da vitória em Punchestown

“Ele é um bom cavalo por si só”, disse Mullins sobre o vencedor.

“Ele estava certo no native; não period como se ele estivesse 20 metros atrás e juntasse os cacos. Ele estaria envolvido na finalização.

“Se Kopek cometeu um erro e saiu impune, ele estava bem atrás dele.

“Ele sempre foi um bom cavalo, mas as coisas simplesmente não deram certo para ele. É bom fazer uma grande corrida como essa com ele. Ele venceu em Aintree no ano passado e não é um número atrasado.

“Ele provavelmente precisa de um bom terreno, ele provavelmente é mais um cavalo de primavera do que um verdadeiro cavalo de inverno.

“Estou muito feliz por Marie e Joe Donnelly. Eles tiveram uma temporada decepcionante, mas agora têm Kitzbuhel e esse cara vencendo.”

Sobre Kopek Des Bordes ele acrescentou: “Ele provavelmente perdeu a concentração indo para a cerca, sem cavalos ao seu redor para mantê-lo concentrado.

“Ele pareceu decolar, mas nunca puxou o trem de pouso e caiu de joelhos. Acho que tanto o cavalo quanto o cavaleiro tiveram muita sorte. Eles parecem estar bem, com os dedos cruzados.”

«La bênção que fait peur a tout joueur de soccer» : le Supra entrevoit de belles Chooses pour Ismaël Yeo malgré la mauvaise nouvelle

Os pires abençoados chegaram a parfois quando compareceram aos poucos e aos jogadores do FC Supra du Québec, que foram levados ao tribunal por seu subie pelo defensor Ismaël Yeo.

A organização confirmou mais esta semana que a temporada do jogo homme de 21 anos terminou após apenas três encontros. Você foi vítima de uma ruptura do ligamento cruzado anterior, uma bênção que geralmente requer uma operação, enquanto enfrenta o Wanderers de Halifax.

« Este é meu companheiro de defesa central, mas é um amigo antes de tudo. Para todas as pessoas que je vois subir esta bênção – c’est sans doute la bênção que fait peur à tout joueur de soccer – c’est vraiment triste », a réagi ao telefone Matisse Chrétien, que amei a festa no machado aux côtes de Yeo.

Le Supra foi confrontado com seu primeiro verdadeiro golpe de Estado. Il faudra encontrou soluções para paliar esta ausência. Você deve aproveitar Keesean Ferdinand ou Thomas Lebeuf no terreno.

« O prochain défenseur que vai ser substituído, il sait qu’il devra mettre les bouchées doubles et moi aussi, a réagi Chrétien, qui connaît Yeo depuis qu’ils se sont afrontés à l’université aux États-Unis. On perd Ismaël, mais on va quand même tout donner et ce n’est pasça qui va changer notre manière de jouer. »

Um imenso potencial

Com este aprendizado de vitesse grand V para a organização da criança, esse não é o preço do tempo antes de bater um grupo de tecido serré. Esta equipe de Quebec «representa aquela que escolheu o plus», para representar os termos de Loïc Kwemi.

En voyant Yeo se abençoador, les joueurs ont vraiment perdu l’un des leurs.

« Ça m’a vraiment touché, a avoué Kwemi. É um jogador com boas qualidades. Eu sempre fui meus co-equipadores e eu viajei muito no potencial de desenvolver um dos melhores defensores da liga, malgré son jeune âge. »

« Juste avec les deux matches qu’il a pu jouer, il a su montrer qu’il avait les qualités pour jouer dans esta liga. Em um ódio qu’il revienne et qu’il puisse montrer filho talento », ajouté l’attaquant.

Antes de assinar um contrato com o Supra, Ismaël Yeo trouxe as cores do CS Saint-Laurent e dos Redhawks de Seattle, na NCAA. Na primeira temporada profissional, você pode ser educado, mas parece ter deixado uma excelente impressão.

I’m a cyber security expert

If you feel exhausted from having to create and keep track of an ever-growing number of passwords, you’re not alone. A 2019 study by Google found that about 65 per cent of people reuse their passwords for some, if not all, of their online accounts and subscriptions.

“Password fatigue” is a growing problem – and leads to people writing down passwords, or reusing the same one (or a slight variation) repeatedly. It can result in data breaches, identity theft, and ultimately financial losses.

Experts say most security breaches are not caused by sophisticated hacking; they result from common password mistakes that quietly weaken multiple accounts at once. The National Cyber Security Centre, part of GCHQ, has announced that passkeys, a newer method for logging into online accounts, should now be consumers’ first choice for logging in across all digital services. With passkeys, instead of creating and remembering a password, your device handles the authentication for you, usually using biometrics like a fingerprint or face ID, or a secure device PIN.

We spoke to Jemma Davis, founder of Culture Gem, and a specialist in cyber behaviour and accessible security awareness, to find out how to keep your passwords and data safe.

Stop reusing the same password across multiple sites

If you have one good, strong password, it can be tempting to use it across multiple sites, so you always remember it. But as Davis explains, the issue is that a single breach can trigger a domino effect. “If a password is exposed on one site and the same one is used elsewhere, attackers will try it across email, shopping accounts, social media, and banking. That is what makes reuse so risky. It is not just about one account being affected; it is about the knock-on effect across your whole digital life.”

This tactic, known as credential stuffing, is an incredibly effective type of cyber attack in which attackers use previously leaked usernames and passwords to try to log in to other websites. Because the process is automated, attackers can test thousands of login combinations in minutes. Even strong passwords can fail if they are reused. So, as tempting as it is to keep the same password for multiple sites, the risk is too great.

Some passwords look strong, but are predictable

Passwords that replace a letter with a number, like substituting an I for !, might look secure at a glance, but they follow predictable patterns that password-cracking tools are designed to detect. Davis says password strength is determined far more by length and randomness than by complexity alone. Longer passphrases made of unrelated words are significantly harder to crack than short, complex-looking strings.

Davis says, “A password needs to be unique, and ideally longer than 12 characters, rather than just being visually complicated”.

Better to write logins in a notebook than an app

Davis warns against logging all your passwords in your notes app. “If a device is compromised, synced insecurely, or left unlocked, those credentials may be very easy to access.”

A password book kept at home sounds like a bad idea, but Davis says it’s often a perfectly reasonable coping strategy, especially for people managing lots of accounts, or for those who need a system that works in the real world. “The motivation of someone stealing a notebook is usually not cyber crime. That risk is very different from reusing the same password across multiple online accounts. The bigger issue is whether the method helps the person stay organised without creating wider exposure.”

Always use a password manager

Using a password manager secures your online accounts by generating, storing, and auto-filling complex, unique passwords in an encrypted vault, so you only need to remember one master password. Davis says password managers are a great option because they reduce the pressure to remember everything. “They make it much more realistic than using a different password for every account. They are not the only acceptable solution, but they are one of the most practical ones, particularly for people with lots of online accounts.”

You can download a password manager app on your phone or tablet, or use one on a website in your browser. Whichever type you use, once you’ve logged into it, it will store your passwords for all your online accounts in a safe place. One of the main benefits of a third-party password manager over one in your browser is that it can synchronise passwords even when you have a mix of different browsers and devices.

.. and Two-Factor Authentication

With Two-Factor Authentication (2FA), rather than depending on a single password, access is granted only after a second verification step is completed. This may involve entering a temporary code that is sent to you by text or email, approving a request in an authentication app, or using a hardware security key. Yes, it’s an extra, annoying step, but Davis says 2FA is one of the most common missed opportunities in personal security. “If a password is stolen, guessed, or reused from another breach, 2FA can be the thing that stops that from becoming a full account takeover. It adds friction, but it also adds a very important second barrier.”

If you enable 2FA on your email accounts, banking and finance apps, cloud storage and social media profiles, it will make it much harder for someone to access your accounts.

Try passkeys

Passkeys are a newer way to log in to accounts without a traditional password. Instead of creating and remembering a password, your device handles the authentication using biometrics like a fingerprint or face ID, or a secure device PIN.

Davis explains they are more secure because there is no password to steal, guess, or reuse. “The login is tied to your device, and the underlying technology means the actual credential is not shared with the website in the same way a password is. This makes common attacks like phishing and credential stuffing far less effective. In practical terms, if someone is tricked into entering their details on a fake site, a passkey will not work in the same way a password would. That removes one of the most common routes attackers use to gain access to accounts.”

Passkeys reduce many of the everyday risks associated with passwords and eliminate the need to remember or store multiple logins. “That said, they are not yet available everywhere, and people still need to think about device security and access. If someone loses a device or shares it with others, that becomes part of the risk picture,” says Davis.

Source link

Polícia de J&K arquiva caso sobre ‘divulgação de vídeo separatista’

A célula cibernética da Polícia J&K abriu um processo contra certos indivíduos na quinta-feira (30 de abril de 2026) sobre a disseminação de propaganda separatista “que visa perturbar a paz pública e a integridade nacional”.

De acordo com a polícia, houve um “crime aparente aparente” punível nos termos das Secções 152, 196(1) e 353(1)(b), (c) e (2) do Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Source link

Why Ski Sunday could be next BBC Sport show at risk of axe

BBC Sport staff fear more programme cuts and redundancies after the axeing of Football Focus with AI now being trialled to produce reports.

Insiders believe more long-running shows could be dropped with bosses planning to close 2,000 jobs under a new £500m savings drive.

BBC Sport director Alex Kay-Jelski has told staff that resources will be directed towards video content made for YouTube, Instagram and the BBC app, in a bid to reach younger audiences.

Shorts – Quick stories

Declining ratings and changing viewer habits led Kay-Jelski to pull the plug on Saturday institution Football Focus after 52 years.

He will take an unsentimental approach to wringing value out of every penny of his budget, with more “legacy” shows potentially under threat, The i Paper understands.

Schedule fixtures like Ski Sunday, the BBC Two winter teatime show which has undergone numerous revamps since its 1978 debut, could come under scrutiny.

During its 1980s peak, Ski Sunday attracted 4.5 million viewers. It now hovers around the one million mark, with live alpine skiing covered on dedicated sports channels. Presented by Ed Leigh and Chemmy Alcott, the format has expanded to cover snowboarding and other events which attract younger audiences.

One insider said: “If a programme is a fixture in the TV schedules but isn’t making a big enough impact to justify the cost, then it’s probably going to go the way of Football Focus.

TX DATE:,TX WEEK:,EMBARGOED UNTIL:,PEOPLE:Alex Scott,DESCRIPTION:,COPYRIGHT:BBC,CREDIT LINE:BBC / Nick Eagle
Alex Scott will present the final Football Focus next month. She will remain ‘at the heart’ of the BBC’s sports output (Photo: Nick Eagle/BBC)

A BBC source said: “We have been clear that we are looking at all options to meet our 10 per cent savings challenge. No decisions have been taken.”

Discussions have yet to take place over any plans for the return of Ski Sunday next winter, The i Paper has learnt. The BBC’s 2026 Winter Olympics coverage recorded 83 million streams, illustrating digital interest in snow sports.

The BBC was outbid for this summer’s Commonwealth Games in Glasgow by Warner Bros Discovery and jettisoned the Boat Race after nearly a century of broadcasts, in order to “deliver the best value for audiences with the that money we have”.

Wimbledon deal discussions

The BBC hopes to extend its £60m deal for Wimbledon after 2027 with the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club reportedly seeking new ideas to modernise the coverage.

The daily news segment Sportsday was scrapped last year, in a shake-up which saw 27 jobs go.

“There’s been a lot of change and fear of more redundancies with the latest cuts round,” the insider added. “The drive is to reach younger fans on digital platforms.”

BBC sources said its sports output was “continuously evolving in line with changing audience behaviours, as more people choose to consume content across a mix of television, radio, digital platforms and social media”.

Facing competition for attention from podcasts including Gary Lineker’s The Rest Is Football, Kay-Jelski, a former newspaper executive and editor-in-chief of The Athletic app, has encouraged punchier debates among BBC pundits and more in-depth analysis on the BBC Sport website.

There will be “fresh formats” to replace the axed shows, under “ambitious plans” to put more BBC sport action and analysis on YouTube, sources said – Wayne Rooney’s visualised podcast has racked up 156 million clip views this football season.

AI-generated football news

But there are fears that AI could wipe out sports journalism and production roles, a process already under way in the wider news media.

“They are using generative AI to make a daily football news bulletin with a synthetic voice. But how far will AI go?” the insider asked.

The BBC is trialling My Club Daily, an audio news bulletin for the Sounds app covering 13 English and Welsh clubs, including Liverpool and Newcastle United, produced using Gen AI tools.

The ChatGPT-generated script wrapping up the day’s club news, is voiced by a synthetic AI voice. The BBC said the trial was a success and the Daily will now be scaled up to cover more clubs. Sport staff have been asked to attend AI seminars.

However the BBC said it will only use AI to “organise and reformat existing BBC articles about the clubs to produce a draft audio script”, not to write new stories.

Each script and recording is “checked for accuracy by our editorial team before the completed update is published, and we will clearly highlight our use of AI to listeners in line with the BBC’s AI transparency commitments”.

Impact of ‘hatchet man’

Called a “hatchet man” in reports for his willingness to take tough decisions, such as the removal of Lineker from his BBC duties over an antisemitic post, Kay-Jelski’s forthright approach has disconcerted some at BBC Sport’s Salford base since his arrival two years ago.

An email mentioning redundancies along with training opportunities to produce more video content advised staff: “If the thought of more change is something that concerns you or you feel the direction we’re heading in is not the right fit for you, please have an open conversation with your line manager or HR to discuss all available options, including potential voluntary redundancy.”

BBC sources point to successes during Kay-Jelski’s reign including the decision to replace Lineker with a rotating trio of Match of the Day (MoTD) presenters, with match highlights available on the iPlayer and BBC website hours ahead of its TV broadcast.

Digital viewing of MoTD content is up 36 per cent on last season while the new line-up of Mark Chapman, Gabby Logan and Kelly Cates has been well received by viewers.

While the BBC’s portfolio of exclusive live rights has shrunk, with the broadcaster unable to match high-spending rivals, a deal to secure World Snooker until 2032 has paid off. The sport retains a loyal TV audience with this week’s World Championships from Sheffield delivering bumper ratings for BBC Two.

The BBC said it retained the “one of the strongest and most enduring rights portfolios in the industry”, including Premier League highlights through to 2029, the Fifa World Cup 2026 and Fifa Women’s World Cup 2027 and the London Marathon.

The BBC now shares live rights to Wimbledon and the Olympics with Warner Bros Discovery-owned channels in deals which ensure that the key moments in sport’s “crown jewel” events are broadcast free-to-air.

Source link

My ground rent is doubling to £1,500 – leasehold reform delays would force me to sell

In 2029, the ground rent on Terry Patterson’s one-bedroom leasehold flat in Tufnell Park, north London, is set to double from £750 to £1,500 a year.

Earlier this year, Terry thought she had been given a lifeline. In January, Labour announced plans to cap ground rent at £250 per year, which, when implemented, would not only have stopped her costs increasing, but reduced them by £500 a year.

However she says she has been “let down” afterThe i Paper revealed that a series of housing reforms by the Government may not come in until the 2030s.

The Government insists the ground rent cap is still on schedule to be introduced by 2028, but news of delays to leasehold reform has some homeowners fearing the worst.

In a leasehold system, homeowners do not really own their home; they merely own the right to lease it for a specified period of time and must pay ground rent as well as lease extension fees.

Speaking at the Institute for Government, housing and planning minister Matthew Pennycook outlined his plan to end the leasehold system of homeownership in England and Wales, by transitioning to a system known as “commonhold”.

However, in an interview following his speech, Pennycook said some parts of the Leasehold and Commonhold Bill may not come into force in this Parliament because of its complexity – the bill has 260 clauses.

If delays affect ground rent reforms, they may come too late for people like Terry.

Her lease is affected by a doubling clause, which means her ground rent doubles 25 years after the lease starts, and at other points.

The only way to avoid this happening was for Terry to pay to extend her lease, which would take the rent back to what is known as a peppercorn level – effectively zero. But this would cost her £25,000, which is money she can’t afford to spend.

The rise in her ground rent is set to happen in 2029 – just as the 62-year-old part-time psychotherapist hits state pension age. And she fears Labour’s reform will “never happen” if reforms don’t happen during this parliament, as the party may not be in government after that date.

“I can’t see this ever happening if it gets delayed further. Surely three years is enough time to get your act together,” said Terry, adding that the prospect of a delay until the 2030s had “plunged” her into a new dilemma over what to do.

“When the rise in ground rent comes in it will be very difficult to afford my flat, but it will also be hard to sell it,” she said. “But because it’s a one-bed, I won’t be able to downsize. I’ll probably have to leave London, where I’ve lived for decades.

“Extending the lease isn’t really an option as I don’t have a huge pot of money to pay for that and I am semi-retired so I can’t really increase my income to save.

“What Labour are doing is letting down leaseholders.”

In Labour’s 2024 general election manifesto, the party promised to “finally bring the feudal leasehold system to an end”.

However, while Pennycook suggested that he expects the legislation to pass in this Parliament, which is due to run until 2029, he warned that the laws may not come into force until later.

He spoke to The i Paper ahead of the Renters’ Rights Act coming into force on Friday, in what will be the biggest shake-up of tenants’ rights in England and Wales since 1988.

He said his plans would see “commonhold become the default tenure” of homeownership in England and Wales. “We do want to be ambitious. We’re going as fast as we possibly can, balancing speed with care,” he added.

Source link

The very existence of Jews in Britain was attacked at Golders Green

The stabbing of two Jewish men in Golders Green was not just an attack on two individuals. It was an attack on the basic promise that in modern Britain, we Jews should be able to walk the streets without fear of being targeted for who we are.

But this doesn’t come in a vacuum. It is part of a grim pattern that has become disturbingly routine. Jewish people are harassed on the streets, ostracised in their workplaces, and vilified simply for who they are. Antisemitism has permeated our society to such an extent that we’ve now had a series of attacks on Jewish communities in the last few weeks.

Understandably, the message behind these attacks seems to many in our community that being visibly Jewish carries a cost. And with attacks on British Jews becoming more and more frequent, that cost is rising.

Time and time again, after every attack we are told that there is zero tolerance for antisemitism and that lessons have been learned. But words are cheap. And increasingly, they ring hollow.

Because while these attacks are only increasing, accountability has not.

We are given more money to protect our synagogues, our schools, and our streets. We are of course grateful for that support; that funding is needed. But why should the onus always be on Jews to protect ourselves, instead of rooting out the cause of these horrific events in the first instance?

It is the consequence of a system that routinely fails to confront antisemitism. Take, for example, the knifeman who terrorised staff at a kosher supermarket, also in Golders Green. In 2024 he was handed two suspended sentences and an alcohol treatment requirement instead of prison time. No meaningful deterrent, and so the cycle continues.

But it is not inevitable, and there are things we can do to reverse the tide. Firstly, we must be honest about the threat. Harakat Ashab al-Yamin al-Islamia, the Iranian-linked group that claims responsibility for the latest spate of arson attacks and Wednesday’s stabbing, should be proscribed immediately. If an organisation inspires or is associated with violence against British Jews, it must not be tolerated.

Secondly, the Government must finally take decisive action against the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. For too long, there has been hesitation, caveated language, and political caution. That must end. The IRGC should be formally proscribed, and this commitment should be placed clearly in the King’s Speech next month. Anything less signals weakness in the face of a regime that has been repeatedly linked to destabilising activity and extremist networks.

Thirdly, there must be diplomatic consequences. The expulsion of the Iranian ambassador, and potentially wider diplomatic staff, should be on the table. States that export or enable hatred cannot expect business as usual.

And finally, the justice system must recognise the threat British Jews are facing. During the summer riots of 2024, we saw that when the political will exists, court processes can be expedited. A clear message was sent that disorder would not be tolerated. Why should antisemitic violence be treated with any less urgency?

But laws and policies alone are not enough. Because antisemitism does not exist in a vacuum. It is fed by a culture that too often excuses, minimises or redirects it. A culture where Jewish concerns are questioned, where our fears are downplayed, where antisemitism is treated as conditional.

That needs to change. This is not just an issue for us as British Jews. It is an issue for British values.

When any group is targeted with impunity, the fabric of our country begins to fray. The values we claim to uphold, which the Jewish community have played a role in helping to shape – like fairness, tolerance, the rule of law – are tested. And right now, we are failing that test.

Antisemites are raising the cost of being Jewish through fear, intimidation, and violence. Our response must be the opposite: we must raise the cost of being antisemitic. Yes, that means real consequences. It also means real solidarity.

Where are the anti-racist activists who are so quick to flood the streets in protest for any other cause? Britain has a strong tradition of fighting racism in all its forms, but it is beginning to feel like antisemitism is the one prejudice that is effectively tolerated.

If the Britain I know wants to stamp out this evil for good, it’s time for all of us to stand visibly and unapologetically with the Jewish community. Not just after the headlines fade, but consistently, firmly, and without caveat.

The question this moment poses is not complicated. Will we allow our community, British Jews, to live openly and safely in this country? Or will we accept a reality where their safety depends on keeping their heads down?

Wednesday’s attack in Golders Green demands an answer. And history will remember what we chose.

Source link

a made-up history of white colonisers

Donald Trump’s response to the shooting in Washington DC on Saturday reiterates his only coherent narrative – an obsession with being a Great Man of History. He was “honoured” to be a target, he said, because “when you look at the people… whether it was an attempt or a successful attempt, they’re very impactful people. Just take a look at the names.”

For once, I agree with the US President. He will be remembered as a big name, but not necessarily in the way he intended. For all his professed obsession with “Western civilisation”, he is perhaps America’s first non-Western president. The one who has shown the fragility of the US alliance with Europe, threatened to break apart Nato, and more importantly, consistently violated the values people who believed in “The West” thought were its own. The actions of this US President and other populists will be remembered for exposing the idea of “The West” first to breaking point, and now to total narrative collapse.

That this US administration believes fervently in the idea of “The West” is not in question. In a National Security Strategy published in December, it warned that Europe faces “civilisational erasure”, warning of a loss of “national identities and self-confidence” thanks to migration policy, censorship and a lack of strong militaries and economies. It called for the restoration of “Western identity”.

Shorts – Quick stories

Identities are constructed, and the idea of being “Western” is no exception. The problem with this particular identity is how tenuous it is. There is not, and has never been a “West”. The crass chaos of the Trump administration has only helped strip away the facade for what the narrative of “the West” has always been: a made-up history of white colonisers at every longitude – from Argentina to Israel.

It is about nations addicted to the industrialised killing of perceived “others” to maintain, ironically, a story about rights, and the rule of law, and how civilised they are. It has always been a story. Democracy in Britain was built on autocratic rule in the colonies, where dissidents were imprisoned and shot.

A police K-9 Unit officer works outside the venue following a shooting incident during the annual White House Correspondents' Association dinner in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 25, 2026. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno
Emergency services at the scene following Saturday’s shooting at the White House correspondents’ dinner in Washington DC. Trump suggested assassination attempts happened to ‘impactful people’ (Photo: Ken Cedeno/Reuters)

Colonial history has a way of continuously resurfacing. A recent leak from the Pentagon, suggesting the US could trade British sovereignty over the Falklands for support in the Iran war, powerfully makes the point. Trump shows great support for Argentinian President Javier Milei, one of the world’s most enthusiastic cheerleaders for so-called “Judeo-Christian” values – merging religious teachings to advocate for a conservative moral outlook.

Milei is one of the doomsayers of a much older tradition, the idea of Western decline. “The West is in danger,” he warned earlier this year.

That this sentiment may lead the USA and Argentina to unite against Britain, which has no logical business owning land in the South Atlantic in the first place, is a mind-boggling example of this “Western” incoherence. An American president is using the language of anti-imperialism to side with a populist in Argentina against Britain, a democracy whose continuing imperial possessions are a reminder of how hollow these ideas have always been.

In the 19th century, Europeans crafted a new origin story about their identity, imagining them in the early democratic ideas of Ancient Greece and Rome. The fact those empires were physically and intellectually closer to Asia and Africa was an inconvenient detail.

It’s hard to pinpoint the exact historical moment the myth of “Western civilisation” captured the imagination of the political class. But it wouldn’t be far off to say its roots lie in a war with Iran.

Nineteenth-century politician John Stuart Mill said that the Battle of Marathon in 490BC – in which the Athenians repulsed a Persian invasion – “as an event in English history, is more important than the Battle of Hastings”.

Had the Greeks lost, as Mill put it, “the Britons and the Saxons might have still been wandering in the woods”. The reality could not be more different. Ancient Greece drew its ideas from Africans, and Ancient Rome survived into the Middle Ages in Turkey. Their ideas were kept alive not by Europe, but by Islamic scholars, who harboured and evolved them for centuries before they were introduced to Europe.

The real origins of ideas considered “Western” are far from the actual “West”. So for most of my life, I assumed the mythmaking around the so-called “Western civilisation” would undergo a series of factual corrections until it was rendered essentially redundant.

Instead, it’s more muscular and violent than ever. Trump and his populist allies have not only revived this fiction, but shouted loudly about this “civilisation” while simultaneously demonstrating how uncivilised it can be.

Assassinating leaders in the midst of negotiations, as the US and Israel did to Iran, before lamenting there is “no one left to negotiate with”. Threatening to seize territory from allies such as Denmark, who have jumped to the aid of US aggression in previous wars, like the war in Iraq. Attacking the independence of the judiciary, law firms, universities and government officials and anyone else who does not behave like the President’s private staff. Carrying out unlawful interventions abroad, such as Venezuela, and supporting unlawful, fatally armed insurrections within, like January 6.

‘The West’ is now whatever America says it is

The West has problematic racial ideas baked into the very core of its identity. To position itself as “The West” has always required an other, giving rise to “The Third World”, the “The Far East”, “The Middle East” and other identities formed to bolster an innate sense of “Western” superiority.

The fate of Jewish people is one of the most powerful examples. Long before Mill and German-American political philosopher Francis Lieber, who came up with the phrase “Western civilisation”, proto-ideas of “The West” wreaked havoc against Jews. A belief in defending “Christendom” and the Catholic Church – even Christianity was bad if it was “eastern” – drove Crusaders and genocidal Europeans to persecute and murder Europe’s Jews.

The nations that would later congratulate themselves for existing at the heart of “The West” carried out inquisitions and pogroms. Right up to the 20th century – the Nazi Holocaust was met, at first, with a level of indifference.

“Western civilisation” allowed the murder of Jews to “bounce off consciences like peas off a steel helmet”, as George Orwell described it in 1944. It’s one of history’s greatest ironies that Israel has now hijacked those same ideas to continue the most violent of the West’s projects.

At least the 19th and 20th-century architects of the idea of “The West” genuinely believed in its values. For John Stuart Mill, it was the promise of democracy. For US political scientist Samuel Huntington, Christianity and the rule of law. For the Australian writer PD Marchant, it was the dream of “a Man with one wife, a vote and a union card”.

Even African American thinkers like W E B Du Bois believed “Western values” could be the ultimate emancipatory tool.

It’s becoming harder for any sensible person to look at the world now and believe everything will be OK if only the West has its way. Fossil-fuelled, industrialised consumption has gone from the ideal of progress, to one of the most suicidal ideas in history, making our planet uninhabitable. “The West” has deteriorated into whatever America says it is.

America, rather than protecting those “Western civilisational” ideas, flawed as they are, has become a predatory hegemon. Less the actual Crusades – although those are a legacy damning enough – more Crusade cosplay. Ironically if they were alive today, I suspect the original creative writers of “The West’s” identity would be the most embarrassed by its crude demise.

Afua Hirsch is the author of Brit(ish) and Decolonising My Body. Her documentaries include Enslaved with Samuel L Jackson and BBC series Africa Rising. She is professor of journalism at the University of Southern California

Source link