The hidden health risk from eating too much ‘fake meat’

Recent health concerns over veggie sausages and burgers have focused on the fact they are highly processed foods, with long lists of ingredients not found in the average kitchen.

Now there’s a new worry: eating too many of such meat substitutes could potentially harm your health because they contain toxins usually found only in foods in hot countries.

These “mycotoxins” develop mainly in tropical or subtropical regions, when mould starts growing on crops like grains, nuts, beans and fruit.

But mycotoxins were found contaminating all 212 plant-based meat substitutes sold in British supermarkets, according to a recent investigation funded by the EU’s Horizon science programme. It was published in the journal, Food Control.

The toxins were at very low levels, and are likely to only be a possible danger for people who eat a lot of the products, such as vegans and vegetarians, said Dr Andrea Patriarca, a food scientist at Cranfield University.

Shorts – Quick stories

“The concern is for diets that are exclusively based on alternative plant-based products, because [people] are exposed to a broad range of mycotoxins. The effect increases when you are exposed to them all together.”

The UK’s Food Standards Agency plans to monitor the science and take any appropriate steps, The i Paper understands.

Mycotoxins are not usually at harmful levels in UK food, but they are a major public health problem in hotter countries, growing on crops either before harvest or during storage or processing. There may be no visible mould on the food.

A particularly dangerous compound, called aflatoxin, is produced when moulds grow on maize, peanuts and nuts.

It can cause liver cancer by damaging DNA and triggering mutations. It is thought to cause up to 150,000 cancers a year, mainly in Africa and Asia. There are several other mycotoxins, produced by different species of mould, and they can also cause problems with digestion and the immune system.

Food safety laws in the UK and the European Union have limits for the amount of mycotoxins that can be present in various foods, such as breakfast cereals and bread.

But there are no specific regulations about levels in newer plant-based meat alternatives, such as veggie sausages and burgers, and plant-based “chicken” pieces. These are generally made from grains, or pulses, often imported.

To investigate, Dr Patriarca’s team measured levels of 19 different mycotoxins in 212 plant-based foods, bought in several major supermarkets. “We bought as many samples, as many brands as we could find,” she said.

All products contained at least one mycotoxin and some had more than one. Fortunately, the levels were all below the permitted amounts for other foods, such as cereals. “There is no real concern for people consuming these products among others and having a varied diet,” said Dr Patriarca.

But the levels were not negligible. For instance, some vegan burgers and sausages had levels of a compound called aflatoxin B1 at 0.6µg per kg. That’s about a third of the level permitted in cereals. Vegan burgers had levels of another compound called ochratoxin A at 1.59µg per kg, about half the permitted level in cereal.

The permitted levels had been calculated based on people having a typical varied diet and if someone is eating meat alternatives for most of their meals, they could be having harmful amounts, said Dr Patriarca.

Professor Simon Edwards, a mycotoxin expert at Harper Adams University, who was not involved in the research, said the investigation had revealed a potential risk. “The levels seen are certainly of concern for some diets,” he said. “There is a potential concern where you’ve got vegetarians and vegans eating more meat alternatives.”

People are being encouraged to switch meat for plant-based alternatives for health and environment reasons. Red meat is high in saturated fat, thought to be bad for the heart, and vegetables are high in fibre, which is good for the digestive system.

Richard McIlwain, chief executive of the Vegetarian Society, said if there really was a risk to non-meat-eaters, they would have higher rates of cancer. “They tend to have lower rates of cancer,” he said.

“Our recommendation is people consume ultra-processed foods as part of a healthy diet, not that they eat veggie burgers and sausages three times a day every day.”

Andy Murray to coach Jack Draper at Wimbledon

Andy Murray will coach at Wimbledon for the first time this summer when he links up with British No 2 Jack Draper.

Murray has long been an informal mentor to Draper, 24, having played as a Davis Cup team-mate to the left-hander and a regular confidant on and off the court.

However, Murray’s only coaching experience came at last year’s Australian Open when he worked with former rival Novak Djokovic, helping to guide him to the semi-finals.

The 38-year-old said he “learned a lot about what coaching is” during a six-month stint working with the Serb, but has not taken up any other roles in the year since splitting with Djokovic – until now.

Draper is currently recovering from a knee injury that has already ruled him out of the French Open at Roland Garros later this month, and had previously been working with Murray’s own former coach Jamie Delgado.

“I am very grateful for everything Jamie Delgado has done for me over these past six months. He is a world class coach and a great man,” Draper said.

“In the interim, I will continue to be supported by the excellent team at the LTA, with the addition of Andy Murray, who will be supporting me throughout the grass court season.”

The pair could make their first appearance together at the Stuttgart Open, which starts on 8 June, but if that comes too soon for Draper’s knee then they will target Queen’s on 15 June, a tournament Murray won a record five times, before Wimbledon starts two weeks later.

More to follow…

I found six hotels that have killed off sunbed wars for good 

A German holidaymaker has successfully sued a tour operator in Greece after the lack of available sun loungers devalued his package holiday due to the dreaded “dawn dash.” The Düsseldorf man, who spent more than £7,000 on a package holiday for four to Kos, won nearly €1,000 (£868) in compensation. He claimed that, despite getting up at 6am, he spent up to 20 minutes a day trying to find sun loungers, only to fail because other holidaymakers had already snagged them ultimately.

Beating the Germans to the sun loungers is a trope as old as package holidays themselves. The frantic early morning scrabble to lay down towels and bags is laid bare in endless TikToks of holidaymakers of all stripes battling for the best spots, sometimes going to the extreme of sleeping on loungers and occasionally resulting in poolside brawls. It’s like a live game of Risk, in which the goal is to conquer Hotel Del Sol in Benidorm rather than taking control of Belarus.

But with mounting pressure on household finances raising expectations for those precious summer escapes, shouldn’t equal access to a sun lounger be a basic holiday right?

The rising tension caused by these towel wars or handtuchkriege, as they’re called in Germany, can ruin a holiday. Each year, there are growing calls for hotels and resorts to crack down on the practice, or at the very least provide a reasonable ratio of sunbeds to guests. Towel confiscation and fines introduced by some resorts and destinations often prove ineffective.

Greece leads the way with extra beds

While a government plan in Greece is gradually removing sunbeds from fragile “Apatites Paralies” (untouchable beaches), some of its island resorts are going in the other direction, in a bid to foster a more relaxing atmosphere around the pool.

Sun loungers on the beach at the Lyttos Beach Hotel (Photo: Lyttos Beach Hotel)
Sun loungers on the beach and lawns at the Lyttos Beach Hotel in Crete (Photo: Lyttos Beach Hotel)

Lyttos Beach Hotel in Crete has 3,500 sun loungers for just 2,150 guests, spread across its 11 pools and Blue Flag Analipsi beach on Hersonissos Bay – a ratio of 1:6 loungers per guest. As well as an Olympic-size outdoor pool, there are polo, indoor, kids’ and splash pools with flumes. And when you’ve finished lounging next to them, there are tennis and football academies, Padel and pickleball courts and beach courts for volleyball and football. Caspar Nelson, holiday expert at online package holiday specialist On the Beach, said: “Getting a sunbed can sometimes feel more competitive than the Olympics, but at Lyttos Beach, there’s absolutely no need for sunbed wars.” Doubles start at £217 all-inclusive in May.

On the island of Rhodes, the Akti Imperial Deluxe Resort & Spa Dolce by Wyndham has also invested in more poolside furniture with 2,150 sunbeds for its 1,850 guests, in case they don’t fancy exploring the ancient ruins of the Lindos Acropolis. There are also 42,000 m2 of gardens, a main pool with a “no-sunbed-reservation policy” (loungers left unattended for more than 40 minutes have towels or personal items removed by pool staff), a quiet “snail pool,” and a lounger-lined private beach. Doubles start at €178 (£155) all-inclusive in May.

Tech helps stamp out the stampede

Technology is helping combat the towel war, too. Digital reservation systems allow fairer access to sun loungers, eliminating the need to get up for the “dawn dash.”

However, there is potential for this to be an opportunity for hotels to start monetising sun loungers in the way that many upmarket beach clubs do.

Examples include Nikki Beach Dubai and Régence Plage at the Radisson Blu in Nice on the French Riviera, which use booking apps such as MySunbed or BookMySunbed to manage the sun lounger melee, with prices starting at €20 (£17) in Nice and going up to AED1,500 (£300) in Dubai.

At the five-star, adults-only Iberostar Selection Sábila resort in Tenerife, if guests don’t fancy a round of golf or a hike up Mount Teide, they can book a sun lounger for free, via the Iberostar app or reception. However, it has to be claimed by 10.45am. Guest reviews mention this as a highlight. Doubles start at €272 (£236) in May.

Sun loungers line a beach near Venice (Photo: StockImages_AT/Getty Images)
Sun loungers line a beach near Venice. Digital reservation systems could help combat the towel war (Photo: StockImages_AT/Getty)

Many Eurocamp sites in Europe have introduced a similar reservation system. Netmum’s Joanna Lovell tried it out at the Pra Delle Torri, a family park in Caorle near Venice. Italy has a long tradition of lidos, beach clubs where hundreds of sun loungers line the sand in uniform fashion, which can cost dearly in the most exclusive spots.

However, at Pra Delle Torri, reservations cost €6.50 (£5.60) per day, paid online in advance, while the park’s lodges start at £381 per week in May for up to six guests. “It was brilliant! We could have a lazy morning and arrive at our sunbeds whenever we wanted, knowing no one else would be on them. I wish more places did it as it saves the rush and the worry that you won’t get a sunbed,” said Lovell.

“I’m an organised person, so I was happy to secure these months before. The only downside is that if you’ve not been before, you won’t necessarily know your preferred spot around the pool, so I booked different spots each day for variety.”

An old fashioned approach to booking

For guests at the Olympic Lagoon Resorts in Ayia Napa, Cyprus, pre-booking is not a problem. As an alternative to the ritzy beach clubs on Nissi Beach, the hotel’s poolside towel kiosk issues guests numbered cards for sun loungers and umbrellas on the first day of their holiday, which are valid for the entire stay. Doubles from €346 (£300) all-inclusive in May.

In Paphos – where you can find Roman mosaics and Aphrodite’s Rock – the Alexander The Great Beach Hotel also allocates guests their own personal sun loungers and umbrellas for the duration of their holiday. Doubles start at €315 (£273) B&B in May,

The result of the recent sunbed court case is the beginning of the end of the “dawn dash”. As these trailblazing hotels and resorts show, if you pile on extra loungers, use booking apps, hand out personal tags, and employ the staff to monitor any potential “towel rage” situations, this age-old problem could be consigned to history.

Defiant Starmer tells allies he can win a leadership contest

Sir Keir Starmer has told allies he believes he can win a leadership contest as his premiership teeters on the brink. 

According to sources, he has seen private polling which suggests he could still win a ballot of the Labour Party membership. 

However, one MP joked that he would only win if the only other candidate was Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, who has become a lightening rod for criticism after the public backlash to her plans to axe winter fuel payments and raise taxes. 

Shorts – Quick stories

It comes as the PM threw down the gauntlet to his rivals in this morning’s Cabinet meeting and dared them to challenge him. He told the Cabinet: “The Labour Party had a process for challenging a leader and that has not been triggered.” 

One MP said the PM was right to try to flush out his rivals: “If they’ve not got the bottle to put their names on a nomination form, then he is right to tell them to put up or shut up.” 

Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, who is widely seen as one of the frontrunners in the race to succeed Starmer, left Cabinet without speaking to the media, despite other ministers publicly showing their support for the PM. 

Andy Burnham, another leadership frontrunner, arrived in London shortly after midday. There is widespread speculation that he might be about to announce that he has found an MP willing to step aside for him – paving the way for his return to Westminster. 

Starmer ‘rebuffed’ Streeting’s attempt to speak to him at Cabinet

Despite claims last night that Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, was among a contingent of senior ministers to urge the Prime Minister to set out a timetable for his departure, none of the Cabinet directly challenged him during morning’s meeting. One minister present told The i Paper that it was a “serious discussion” focused on the Strait of Hormuz. 

 A government source said: “Keir said in Cabinet that he won’t discuss the elections or his leadership, and that he will only speak to cabinet ministers about that individually. Then after the meeting he refused to see Cabinet ministers individually.” 

Streeting was one of a number of Cabinet ministers who tried to speak to the PM after the Cabinet meeting but the PM refused to speak to them, The i Paper understands. 

Today’s resignations ‘the tip of the iceberg’

As pressure continues to mount on the PM, Jess Phillips, the Safeguarding Minister, became the second minister to resign in the wake of the disastrous local election results. 

In a letter addressed to the Prime Minister, Phillips called on Starmer to step down, saying she could not “keep waiting around for a crisis to push for faster progress”. 

She added: “Over a year ago I presented solutions, long worked on by brilliant civil servants that would end the ability for children in the UK to take naked images of themselves. 91 per cent of online child sex abuse is self-generated by children groomed, tricked and exploited in to abuse. The technology exists to stop children being able to take naked images of themselves. We could make this possible on every phone and device in the country. We could stop this abuse. It has taken me a year to get you to agree to even threaten to legislate in this space. Not legislate, just threaten. This is the definition of incremental change. Nothing bold about it. The announcement was meant to be in March, I’m still on a promise this will happen in June, I’ve given up believing it. How many children were left without a safety net in the time we dilly dallied and worried about tech bosses?” 

Earlier on Tuesday, Miatta Fahnbulleh resigned as Minister for Devolution, Faith and Communities. In a letter she told the PM “to do the right thing for the country and the party and set a timetable for an orderly transition” as the public had lost trust in him because of issues such as the scrapping of the winter fuel payment. 

‘What the f*ck are their policies?’

A Government source told this newspaper that these resignations were just the “tip of the iceberg” – suggesting that more ministers will quit in the coming hours. 

However, there are signs that Starmer’s allies are trying to launch a rearguard action against the ongoing coup, which has so far seen 85 MPs call on the PM to stand aside. 

A Government source said Starmer loyalists were vowing “no surrender” to the leadership plotters, adding of contenders for PM: “What the f*ck are their policies?”

 A Labour source said: “I’m hearing there is a groundswell of backbenchers mobilising against those who have come forward in the last two days. I understand that Cabinet was largely supportive of the PM, with many comments highlighting the economic and political impact of a leadership challenge. I also understand that the vast majority of junior ministers are frustrated by the actions of Miatta — an individual who continues to believe that Ed Miliband would make a good PM, despite the public having already rejected him.” 

Speaking after the Cabinet meeting, Baroness Jenny Chapman said she was not surprised there was no direct challenge to Sir Keir Starmer’s leadership. 

 “I didn’t think they would be challenging the Prime Minister at Cabinet,” she said. 

 “We have got a job to do. It’s a really serious task. The Prime Minister is leading us in that task and everybody around that table is completely focused on delivering for this country.” 

 Starmer’s handling of the UK response to the war in Iran was praised by several Cabinet ministers during their meeting this morning, The i Paper was told. A number of ministers made positive references to Starmer’s leadership, particularly in the context of the UK government’s response to the Middle East. Besides the PM’s opening remarks about a contest, this was the main focus of discussion in the context of Starmer’s premiership. 

 In a show of support, several ministers took the unusual step of speaking to the gathered press outside No10 after the Cabinet meeting, including Business Secretary Peter Kyle, Technology Secretary Liz Kendall and Housing Secretary Steve Reed. 

Greggs has made me ashamed to be British

Spain – a land of excellent food, rich cultural identity and a beautiful language. Of course, if you’re a British tourist there, odds are you won’t have noticed.

Following the news that UK culinary bastion Greggs is opening a branch at Tenerife South Airport, I find myself compelled to ask for the millionth time – why do the British insist on exporting their culture when they travel? Is there another nation on earth that flies for hours, only to retreat to a copy-paste, theme-park version of their local high street (sunnier but otherwise identical) when they get there. Or is that just us?

Worse still, the bits we insist on bringing with us, alongside our sunnies, are undeniably the nation’s most odious. Our binge drinking is a country-wide health emergency; our beige diets a national embarrassment; our refusal to learn more than two words of another language a point of global hilarity. Yet for millions touching down in Tenerife, Lanzarote, Ibiza (or Zante or Malia, Marseilles or Amsterdam – unfortunately, it’s not just Spain we inflict ourselves on), the prospect of a week in the sun speaking 100 per cent English, eating oven chips and necking pints of Guinness is, inexplicably, the apex of pleasure.

It’s nothing less than perverse, especially when you consider the joy to be had just metres away from a given expat enclave. The quality of basic ingredients in most of mainland Europe is so wildly superior that even a local supermarket can be mind-blowing for a British traveller. And don’t get me started on the restaurants. Anything is better than our unseasoned roasts, grey pies and weird crisps – but between Italy, Spain and France we’re talking about some of the best food in the world. Extraordinary, then, that in the lands of tapas and fresh seafood, we continue to order gammon and mash.

You’d think that people flying to another part of the planet might be interested in experiencing some of it, but you’d be wrong. That is, if the number of crazy golf courses and “Irish Pubs” on holiday strips frequented by my countrymen is anything to go by. We turn up and cause a drunken ruckus, all while behaving as though our crappy culture is so superior that we’d rather not integrate. Is it any wonder recent years have seen literal protests, urging British tourists to go home? Perhaps we should, if we like it so bloody much.

How to account for our appalling behaviour? Is it some kind of colonial hangover, the impulse to impose bargain-basement Britishness everywhere we go? Or are we just such (pathetic) creatures of habit that we can’t bear to branch out, even after travelling hundreds of miles? God knows – one thing’s for sure, the whole thing makes me want to chuck my UK passport into the Mediterranean Sea and change my name to Αιμιλία (Emilia).

Greggs’s Tenerife outpost might technically represent a leap into international territory. But given that half the 13 million travellers who pass through the airport every year are travelling to and from the UK, it’s arguably the safest bet the chain could have made. However much it might pain me, there’s no danger of those tourists clamouring for anything more exotic than a when their flight lands, or the whole time they’re away for that matter. It’s enough to make you wonder why they bothered making the trip in the first place.

Lloyds launches £5,000 deposit mortgage for first-time buyers. Is it worth it?

Lloyds Banking Group is launching a new mortgage aimed at helping first-time buyers get onto the property ladder with deposits as low as £5,000.

From Monday, first-time buyers applying through Lloyds, Halifax and Bank of Scotland will be able to access the deal on properties worth up to £300,000.

On a £300,000 property, £5,000 equates to a deposit of just 1.67 per cent, which is far lower than most mortgages require.

How does the mortgage work?

The mortgage comes on a five-year fixed rate of 5.89 per cent. There’s no fee for the product, but borrowing is capped at 4.5 times income.

It is not available for shared ownership purchases, new-build homes or buyers relying on gifted deposits.

If you were borrowing £300,000 getting a mortgage requiring a 5 per cent deposit, you would need to put £15,000 up front, and if the mortgage required a 10 per cent deposit, you’d need to double this – £30,000.

How good is the rate compared to others?

The product enters a growing market of low-deposit mortgages, although borrowers able to save larger deposits will still typically access cheaper rates.

On a £300,000 purchase using the new deal, a buyer putting down a £5,000 deposit would need to borrow £295,000 at 5.89 per cent. Assuming a typical 25-year repayment term, that would mean monthly repayments of roughly £1,881 a month.

If you were getting a mortgage with a 10 per cent deposit, the best five-year rate on the market, from Virgin Money, is 4.84 per cent.

Borrowing the same amount on this rate would cost just £1,697 per month, but of course you’d have to have saved a bigger deposit.

Amanda Bryden, head of Halifax Intermediaries and Scottish Widows Bank, said: “We regularly get feedback from brokers that first-time buyers find getting a deposit together one of the main barriers to them buying a home and today we are taking another step to help them get past that.”

Andrew Montlake, a mortgage broker at Coreco, said: “This will not be right for everyone, and proper professional advice is essential, but for the right borrower it could be the key that finally unlocks the front door.”

What are the risks?

While lower deposit mortgages can help buyers purchase sooner, they also leave borrowers more exposed if house prices fall.

With only a small amount of equity in the property, buyers could face negative equity if the value of their home drops below the size of their mortgage.

If you bought a flat for £300,000 with a £280,000 mortgage, then the value of the home dropped to £290,000, you could be in negative equity, which makes it hard for you to sell your home or remortgage.

David Hollingworth, associate director at L&C Mortgages, explained: “A smaller deposit does mean a higher chance of negative equity if property prices fall. That only becomes a problem where the property needs to be sold, which would crystallise a loss.”

But he added that the five-year fixed rate structure could provide stability for borrowers during the early years of ownership.

He said: “There’s a big focus on affordability and the mortgage is a five-year fixed rate, so monthly payments won’t be affected by changes to interest rates.

“That should help ensure that payments are manageable and by the end of the five years borrowers will have eaten into their mortgage balance, hopefully riding out any dip in house prices in the meantime.”

Are there other products that do similar on the market and how do they compare?

A growing number of lenders have introduced low-deposit or no-deposit mortgages in recent years as affordability pressures have intensified.

Some products allow borrowers to take out mortgages above 95 per cent loan-to-value, while a small number of lenders have introduced 100 per cent mortgages backed by rental payment histories or family guarantees.

An example is Skipton Building Society’s track record mortgage. This is for people who haven’t owned a property in the last three years, and requires no deposit, with Skipton looking at your track record of paying rent.

Santander also offers a product known as My First Mortgage, which allows you to buy a home with a deposit as small as 2 per cent.

Hollingworth said: “This new launch is significant as it marks another major high-street lender developing solutions for those with a small deposit.

“We’ve seen a growing range of lenders in this space, designing products that could significantly speed up the journey to home ownership.”

Burnham risks losing a by-election, insiders fear

Andy Burnham should abandon his ambitions to return to Westminster amid fears Labour could lose both the mayoralty of Greater Manchester and a by-election, Cabinet ministers told The i Paper.

Senior Labour strategists have been looking with dismay at last week’s local election results in Greater Manchester. Reform won every single ward up for election in Wigan, alongside 18 out of 19 seats in Tameside, with 50-point swings from Labour to Reform.

Labour was also humbled in places like Oldham and Rochdale, while in the centre at the City Council, it was the Greens who triumphed, winning more than twice as many seats up for election than Labour. In Bolton Labour lost five of the seven seats it had up for election. In other parts of the Greater Manchester conurbation, the results were more positive for Labour. The party retained its overall majority in Trafford and Wigan and Salford but also shed multiple seats.

Shorts – Quick stories

“Look, [Nigel] Farage will throw everything he has at both fights and then we find ourselves in an even worse mess,” a Cabinet minister told The i Paper. “And how much will they [Reform UK] outspend us by? And then [Green Party Leader Zack] Polanski can sweep in too.”

Burnham is understood to have told allies he has lined up a Parliamentary seat. His supporters have been offering peerages to MPs willing to stand aside so he can return to Westminster, The i Paper reported last week. He was photographed arriving at Euston station hours after Sir Keir Starmer told his Cabinet he was remaining in post as he battles to save his premiership during a growing Labour revolt.

In January Burnham was blocked from standing in the Gorton and Denton by-election by a Starmer-led coalition on Labour’s ruling National Executive Committee. But on Monday Starmer said only it was a matter for the NEC, as senior Labour voices former Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Mayor of London Sadiq Khan said he should be allowed to stand.

A second Cabinet Minister told The i Paper: “Andy has got many, many good qualities, and I get on with him. But if he wanted to be back, he could have come back in 2024. I get the frustration that he was blocked in Gorton and Denton, but it was genuinely for a good reason, and he’s made it hard on himself. He could be back now. He could have come back as an MP in 2024. Had he done so, I’m pretty confident he’d now be in the Cabinet. But he didn’t do that, that was his choice. He made that decision, and that decision has consequences.

“I don’t see an easier, straightforward route back for Andy Burnham, or that Andy Burnham alone is going to solve all of our problems. No one person is going to solve the big political malaise and the huge challenges the country is facing and the threat of Reform.”

Nonetheless, Burnham’s personal branding is strong in the area and he remains popular in Manchester. During the Gorton and Denton by-election campaign multiple voters told The i Paper they would have voted for Labour had Burnham been the candidate. Focus group and polling data suggests he could have won the seat and others in the area.

“Andy Burnham does have a powerful appeal with Greater Manchester voters which I suspect sets him apart from the Labour government or a generic Labour candidate. But such is the unpopularity of Labour right now, and the pull of more radical options on both left and right, that nothing is guaranteed,” Robert Ford, Professor of Political Science at the University of Manchester, said.

A spokesman for Burnham did not immediately reply to requests for comment.

Xabi Alonso stalls on Chelsea job in case Liverpool sack Slot

Chelsea want Xabi Alonso as their next manager but the Spaniard is yet to make a decision in case his preferred destination becomes available.

It is widely understood that Arne Slot will remain as Liverpool head coach next season, but sources close to Alonso say the former Reds midfielder wants to wait and see if that situation changes.

As The i Paper reported on Tuesday, Alonso is the front-runner for the Chelsea job.

“The job is his if he wants it,” a source said.

The Blues have other candidates on their radar with Fulham’s Marco Silva and Bournemouth’s soon-to-be free agent Andoni Iraola both of interest, but it is Alonso who they really want.

Arne Slot is under increasing pressure at Anfield (Photo: Getty)

The Spaniard has some high-profile backing inside the ownership group and will almost certainly be snapped up by someone soon, given what he achieved at Bayer Leverkusen and Real Madrid, where he retains admirers.

It is understood that Chelsea and Alonso’s representatives have been in contact for weeks.

While they do have other options, and do not want to make it look like they have all their eggs in one basket, the club are hopeful that he will accept their offer.

Chelsea want to move fast and have a new boss in place before the World Cup.

Alonso is keen to return to management so will not take too much longer to deliberate.

But as one source puts it, he would have “taken the Chelsea job by now if Liverpool was not still in his thinking”.

A growing number of Liverpool supporters have called for Slot to be sacked after a season where they went from Premier League champions to fighting for Champions League qualification, despite an enormous transfer outlay.

Boos greeted the final whistle of their tepid draw with Chelsea at Anfield on Sunday, such is the growing discontent.

Read more

The club’s hierarchy are understood to be willing to give Slot more time to turn things around, given he won the title in his first season.

A big summer rebuild lies ahead with Mohamed Salah departing and reinforcements needed in various positions.

Alonso is not put off by difficulties Liam Rosenior and Enzo Maresca had dealing with the politics at Chelsea, or the size of the task at Liverpool for that matter.

Rayner: ‘Labour hasn’t shown our values

Angela Rayner has warned Labour has “not shown our values” in decisions such as scrapping the winter fuel allowance under Sir Keir Starmer’s leadership.

The former deputy prime minister said in an exclusive interview, conducted before last week’s local elections, that Labour had been “blown off course” and suffered a backlash from voters.

She added that controversies such as Labour’s stance on the war in Gaza had created “a serious amount of damage for us” and suggested the party needs to reconnect with younger voters.

Shorts – Quick stories

Rayner said, “We’ve not shown our values in some of the decisions that have been made. For example, the winter fuel allowance, the sense of unfairness, and that doesn’t speak to who you are, so people feel ‘we’re not sure about you on that’.”

“They also feel that some of the decisions our government have made are not speaking to our values, that’s pretty clear. You can see that with what’s happened with the war in Gaza, they feel we haven’t stuck to our values on that.”

“I think the public, it’s not a sense of ‘are you one side or another?’ it’s ‘are you right or wrong, are you standing up for our principles?’ and they’re quite passionate about that, and it’s blown us off course, and it’s created a serious amount of damage for us.”

Angela Rayner speaks to Vicky Spratt
Angela Rayner speaks to Alistair Campbell and The i Paper‘s Vicky Spratt

Although Rayner was speaking before the current challenge to Keir Starmer, she is considered one of the favourites to succeed him should he quit or be ousted.

The interview took place while speculation over Starmer’s future, following the Peter Mandelson scandal, was current.

It also comes amid a series of interventions, after the local elections, in which Rayner called for the Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham to be allowed to return to Parliament, and said: “What we are doing isn’t working, and it needs to change. This may be our last chance.”

Rayner was interviewed as part of an investigation by The Rest is Politics podcast into the plight of Gen Z – young adults aged between 14 and 29.

The comments, published today, come as Starmer is facing calls to quit from dozens of his own MPs in the aftermath of local elections which saw Reform win swathes of councils and seats in former Labour heartlands.

In the wide-ranging interview, the former Deputy Prime Minister covered topics such as her time in government, what she calls short-term “sugar rush” politics, the rise of populism and Labour’s communications problem.

Rayner addressed the challenges that the Labour Government has faced. She served as deputy prime minister and housing minister before standing down last September after failing to pay enough council tax on a £800,000 flat in Hove.

“We are not showing [people] the destination. We are saying it’s hard. We are not saying what is hard and where we are going,” Rayner said.

She said: “We need to put rocket boosters up our manifesto…That’s where you get the confidence. That’s where you drive investment. That’s where you get the change.”

Of her time as Secretary of State for Housing, Rayner said she was “in a rush” to push through legislation, including the Renters’ Rights Act, the Planning and Infrastructure Act, the Workers’ Rights Act and leasehold reform.

“I took on more legislation than any other Secretary of State,” she said. She added that being asked to choose which reforms were more important was “like picking between her children”: “I couldn’t pick because they were all needed in order to make the change that people need to feel.”

Rayner warned that young people in particular “feel they’re being saddled with the challenges of Brexit, the COVID pandemic and the 2008 economic crash” and said that politicians need to catch up.

Rayner questioned whether politicians were thinking enough about Gen Z – born between 1997 and 2012 – who she said risk becoming “a lost generation.”

“That was my concern and why I am impatient for the change – and I make no apologies for that,” she said.

“I am creating the basis of change that will pay dividends to the next generation,” she said. “The reforms we are making now will help. They will alleviate some of the challenges – but it’s not going to happen overnight.”

But she added: “We have not helped ourselves in our communications,” and argued that politicians are “waking up to” a new reality of how young people “digest the news and get information” on social media.

Until now, she said, Labour had faced this with “evolution rather than revolution” and said, “we are going to be left behind like the dinosaurs if we aren’t able to grasp that nettle.”

In a speech on Monday, which was widely billed as make-or-break, the Prime Minister attempted to reset his leadership by announcing a new offer for young people, such as “an ambitious youth experience scheme” with Europe and “to go further” on apprenticeships and further education.

Starmer said: “So we will go much further on our investment in apprenticeships, in technical excellence colleges, in special educational needs. We will go much further on our investment in apprenticeships, in technical excellence colleges, in special educational needs.”

“We will make sure every young person struggling to find work will get a guaranteed offer of a job, training or a work placement. And we will go much further with our pride in place programme, back the millions of people who give their time and effort to young people in their community. We will back them, not just with money, but with power,” the Prime Minister also said.

The Gen Z Story is a four-part series for The Rest Is Politics, introduced by Alastair Campbell and presented by The i Paper’s Housing and Society Correspondent, Vicky Spratt. The full interview with Angela Rayner is available on The Rest Is Politics feed.

Trump is at breaking point. His answer may be fresh violence

How on earth did it come to this? Those words must be ringing in the ears of more sensible heads in the Trump administration right now.

Late on Monday, Donald Trump warned reporters that the ceasefire between the US and Iran was on “massive life support” and “unbelievably weak”, having rejected Tehran’s counter-proposal for ending the war as “piece of garbage”.

Shortly afterwards, CNN reported that the frustrated President was “now more seriously considering a resumption of major combat operations than he has in recent weeks.” The report said that people around Trump, including in the Pentagon, have suggested targeted strikes that significantly weaken Iran could force them into accepting a deal that benefits the US.

Shorts – Quick stories

Trump may be losing patience, but it goes without saying that this would be an incredibly risky move by the US President, who has already seen his best laid plans go awry: 10 weeks on, the Iranian regime is still in place and has near-total control of the Strait of Hormuz.

For now, it seems Trump has only two options in front of him if he’s sincere about breaking the deadlock: backing down while making dubious claims of victory, or military escalation. If Trump chooses to escalate, we already know what the most likely targets will be: bridges and power plants. He’s already repeatedly threatened such attacks – going so far as saying he’d destroy every single Power Plant, and every single Bridge, in Iran”.

It is worth noting that there are roughly 300,000 bridges and around 400 power plants at last count. Not all of those bridges are strategically critical to the Iranian regime, and almost all of those power plants have nothing to do with Tehran’s nuclear programme. That would mean the US targeting civilian infrastructure on an unimaginable scale and possibly committing war crimes.

If we are to take Trump’s previous threats with a pinch of salt and assume what he really means is the targeting of strategically critical bridges and nuclear facilities, it would still be a gargantuan task, expending significant US resources, causing possible US military casualties, and in all likelihood leaving Trump pretty much where he already is.

This undated handout photograph released by South Korea's Foreign Ministry on May 10, 2026, shows a damaged part of the South Korean cargo ship HMM Namu docked at a port in Dubai. A South Korean cargo ship hit in the Strait of Hormuz six days ago was struck by unidentified aircraft, the foreign ministry in Seoul said on May 10, days after the fire-damaged HMM Namu arrived in Dubai. (Photo by Handout / South Korean Foreign Ministry / AFP via Getty Images) / RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE - MANDATORY CREDIT "AFP PHOTO / SOUTH KOREAN FOREIGN MINISTRY" - NO MARKETING NO ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS - DISTRIBUTED AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS
South Korea said the cargo ship HMM Namu was hit in the Strait of Hormuz six days ago by unidentified aircraft (Photo: Handout / South Korean Foreign Ministry / AFP via Getty Images)

Last summer, after carrying out airstrikes on Iran in Operation Midnight Hammer, Trump claimed “Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.” A leaked US intelligence report disputed this, saying “the US set them [Iran’s nuclear plans] back maybe a few months, tops”.

What should be clear to Trump and his inner circle by now is that the Iranian regime can absorb far more firepower and damage than he initially believed. Many of its key strategic facilities are underground, like the Natanz nuclear facilities – which is also believed to have been further fortified since the 2025 attacks. Iran is thought to have thousands of medium- and short-range ballistic missiles still in secret locations, a small stockpile of cruise missiles and the potential to buy Russian drones.

The regime has also shown a willingness to expose civilians to danger for strategic effect. Last month, Iranian citizens formed human chains around potential targets, raising the prospect of mass civilian casualties had US strikes gone ahead. Any such attack would have triggered international outrage while handing Tehran a propaganda victory.

It is undeniable that Trump’s actions so far have weakened Iran, but it is equally true that the regime knows where its strengths lie – and how to best utilise them. That it will not go down without a fight is abundantly clear when you see that even at this late stage, it hasn’t budged on Trump’s nuclear demands, nor ceding control over the Strait of Hormuz. It is hard to see how this current deadlock ends without the US committing troops to the ground or entering into a bloody showdown.

Which brings us to option two: Trump finds an off ramp and claims victory.

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 08: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media prior to a Marine One departure from the South Lawn of the White House on May 8, 2026 in Washington, DC. President Trump is flying to Sterling, Virginia to attend a LIV Golf dinner. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Donald Trump is discussing military action with aides as he calls the ceasefire with Iran ‘weak’ (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)

It is reasonable to assume that this is the most attractive option for the mercurial President. His escalating threats and rhetoric pull Iran to the table and force a deal that is largely beneficial to the White House. It is, in a sense, classic Art of the Deal brinksmanship stuff.

What’s harder to imagine is how both sides actually get there. From Tehran’s perspective, Trump has effectively thrown his best punch and it is still standing. The longer this conflict goes on, the harder it becomes diplomatically for Trump. His traditional allies are already backing away from the US and want no part of the fallout. Neither can Trump rely on his apparent great friendships with Vladimir Putin or Xi Jinping, both of whom have deep and lasting ties to Iran, having bonded over their mutual disdain for the US-led West.

There is a third option, which is the continuation of the status quo. We all know the acronym Taco: Trump Always Chickens Out. In the past few weeks, Wall Street traders have replaced this with Nacho: Not A Chance Hormuz Opens.

The longer that goes on, the more soft power and international goodwill America throws away. Every Trump tantrum will be viewed less seriously by allies and adversaries alike. Energy prices will remain high, causing inflation and making people poorer, for which they will no doubt blame the US. Trump’s erratic behaviour will become baked into international diplomacy, as countries find ways to move beyond a US-led world order.

Trump’s failures in Iran have left the world in a considerably more dangerous and unstable place. He has proven that nations he deems weaker than America can still hold the US President over a barrel and leave the leader of the free world with no good options. For a man so obsessed with winning peace prizes and being remembered as a global saviour, it is beyond desperate that he doesn’t understand the damage he is causing.