Andrew and Molly on their Race Across the World

It was the “across the world” element of the BBC’s popular race series that motivated Andrew Clifford, 54, and his daughter Molly, 23, to apply for the show rather than the race itself. Season six’s feel-good family contestants come from the town of Maghera, Mid-Ulster; the trip embodied “the total opposite of what we’d done previously as a family”, explains Molly.

The Clifford’s holidays had been “very standard, very traditional”, she tells The i Paper. Her father’s job as a teacher meant that summer holidays were long. “We went to France a couple of times when I was really tiny. Otherwise, we had a caravan in Donegal that we would have been in all summer, playing on the beach all day. We have family all over Ireland, so we would go down to places like Sligo and Dundalk. We had the best time.”

For Andrew, it was also about life-stage. “Jo and Kush [their 19-year-old rival contestants] have time on their hands, but at my age, it’s more about the opportunities than the outcome”, he says. “It has taken a long personal journey to realise that.” He emphasises that the pair was particularly open to meeting people. “Every opportunity that we had, it was [the desire] to stay in people’s homes.”

They applied while Molly was studying for her final exams as a junior doctor. “I found out the day before my graduation that we were going on the show. It was the weirdest ceremony”, she laughs.

Andrew and Molly in Vasiliki, trying to hitch to Lefkada on the second leg (Photo: BBC/Studio Lambert) BBC TV TV Still
Andrew and Molly Clifford in Vasiliki, Greece, trying to hitch to Lefkada on the second leg (Photo: Studio Lambert/BBC)

They had only been able to tell a very small group of close family members. For everyone else, the cover story was that they were going to Peru. That included the adventure outfitting shop in which they had to politely but firmly decline recommendations for kit suitable for Patagonia, knowing that they’d be on another continent altogether.

The eldest of three siblings, there was no question that it would be Molly who’d join her father for the trip. “There’s a joke in the family about all the reasons my wife wouldn’t do it”, says Andrew. “As a friend, Molly’s a close number two to my wife.” He explains that their relationship is one with a tacit acknowledgment of when to move on from arguments, something that would be invaluable during the more testing moments of the journey.

At a stage in life when you begin to reflect on your legacy, Andrew also has a profound sentimentality about the journey, both literally and metaphorically. He says that when Molly, his oldest daughter was born, he promised her “the sun, the moon and the stars. [Race Across the World] was me trying to fulfil that promise.”

Andrew was captivated by Mount Nemrut at dawn (Photo: Kitti Boonnitrod/Getty Images)
Andrew was captivated by Mount Nemrut, Turkey, at dawn (Photo: Kitti Boonnitrod/Getty)

They had never been anywhere like the places on their 12,000 kilometre race route from Palermo in Italy to Hatgal in Mongolia, which included Mount Nemrut in Turkey and the Kazakh port city of Aktau on the Caspian Sea. “Daddy’s a geography teacher, but I didn’t even know how to spell a lot of the places”, says Molly.

So far, they have maintained a steady third and fourth place at each of the five checkpoints, but Molly is keen to correct the assumption that they’re easy going. “We’re uber competitive. That was the fun element of the trip. We knew we only had to win one leg.”

Andrew adds that they would “race when we had to” while ensuring that they didn’t miss the invaluable opportunities of each destination.

This is evident when they hike to the summit of 2,134 metre Mount Nemrut, where they drink in the sunrise that glows on the colossal limestone statues of Greco-Roman and Persian deities around them. Andrew stands in awe, clearly moved by the ancient wonder and natural phenomenon, while a frustrated Molly wants to keep moving, keen to meet people rather than linger at the summit of the ancient mountain sanctuary.

They also learnt from one another, Molly acknowledging that she would never have hiked up the mountain without her father’s encouragement. “I would have probably followed Harrison and Katie’s path, sticking to cities. He [Andrew] dragged me out of my comfort zone.”

The ancient walls of Khiva in Uzbekistan (Photo: Izzet Keribar/Getty Images)
The ancient walls of Khiva in Uzbekistan (Photo: Izzet Keribar/Getty)

When they are set back by a missed train departure in Khiva, Uzbekistan, Molly is frustrated to tears. “I was in one of the most beautiful places I’ve ever seen, and I was just so deflated. The only thing I was thinking about was that it had been a nightmare to get there, and a nightmare to get out. Isn’t that such a sad way to travel, thinking about how you’re going to leave when you get there? But daddy very quickly pulled me out. And then a random guy came up to me and gave me a hug.”

Despite plenty of alien environments, such as crossing the Uzbek steppe by train from the 2,500 year-old oasis city of Khiva, with its tiled mosques and minarets, to the monumental Silk Road city of Bukhara, it was Italy that captured Molly’s imagination. “Maratea was amazing. It was the tiniest village, and so like home. We stayed with a sailor and the whole place came to life when he was there. We were high as kites when we left.”

The pair took the train from Khiva to Bukhara in Uzbekistan to make up time (Photo: Christophe Boisvieux/Getty Images)
The pair took the train from Khiva to Bukhara in Uzbekistan to make up time (Photo: Christophe Boisvieux/Getty)

Andrew adds that there were places in Kazakhstan that he’d happily go back to, and even live in. “Old women would get up on the underground and offer us their seat, just because we were visitors.”

The most profound sentiments he has taken away from the experience are that “the world is a lovely place. People are kind and helpful”, but also the journey of watching his daughter going into adulthood and becoming a friend. Watching her barter a taxi fare down from $100 among a sizeable group of men in Uzbekistan, he says that “it proved to me what I’ve known all along, that she’s a very capable young woman. I was busting to get home to my wife and tell her what a good job we’ve done with her.

“She’s got the skills, the abilities. She’s also got away with an awful lot because she’s as tight as a duck’s arse with money! Poor Harrison has been getting in the neck [about being shrewd with money]. But Molly was fastidious with the budget. She created a book with every receipt of every bit of money we spent.” Molly adds: “I think me and Harrison would have got to Mongolia with 90 per cent of the budget remaining if we’d been in control together.”

Maratea in Basilicata, Italy, was a highlight for Molly (Photo: Marco Bottigelli/Getty Images)
Maratea in Basilicata, Italy, was a highlight for Molly (Photo: Marco Bottigelli/Getty)

Similarly, Molly has seen her father in a different light: “He’s not my daddy, he’s also my friend. Those moments when I thought, ‘Okay we can do this, and work this out together.’”

However, since returning from filming last September and taking time out before her degree this autumn, Molly’s next adventure will be solo. “I’m going to Peru! The lie that I told everyone, I am actually going to live out. After filming, friends would ask me things like what the national dish was, and I’d have to Google it.” Now she’ll be able to tell them the truth.

Andrew is going back to teaching and then taking his wife on a “compensation gift” holiday as Molly calls it, to see the fjords in Norway in the summer. And after that? More of those precious journeys together, they hope.

Race Across the World is on BBC One at 8pm and also on BBC iPlayer

The best new crime and thriller books to read in May 2026

If you are in the mood for the kind of book that makes you miss your stop on the train or stay up far too late promising yourself “just one more chapter”, then this month’s new crime and thriller releases deliver exactly that.

From the return of crime giants Michael Connelly and Tom Clancy to standout debut mysteries from exciting new voices including pyschotherapist Philippa Perry, here is our pick of the best to get lost in in May…

Solace House by Will Maclean; Blood, Rust and Steel by Stuart MacBride; Honey by Imani Thompson

Solace House by Will Maclean

A heady collision of gothic horror and campus novel, this 1990s-set tale follows a group of students clearing a remote Victorian house who become ensnared by its eerie journals and talk of parallel realms. Unsettling, cerebral and deeply addictive.

Atlantic Books, £20

Blood, Rust and Steel by Stuart MacBride

As DI Roberta Steel eyes retirement, a body is found in a wheelie bin and the case soon spirals into chaos in this gritty, darkly comic second book in the Scottish crime author’s latest series. Packed with protests, politics and Aberdeen’s criminal underbelly, it is a wild, 600-page ride.

Macmillan, £22

Honey by Imani Thompson

A bored Cambridge PhD student turns to murder in this provocative, whip-smart debut, which blends feminist rage with campus politics and dark humour. Thompson’s literary thriller is surrounded by buzz for good reason.

The Borough Press, £16.99

Murder at the Spirit Lounge by Jess Kidd; Ironwood by Michael Connelly; Shrink Solves Murder by Philippa Perry

Murder at the Spirit Lounge by Jess Kidd

Former nun Nora Breen returns for a second outing in this atmospheric seaside mystery, where a séance ends in murder. As bodies mount, Kidd blends wit, charm and the supernatural into a deliciously eerie whodunnit with a strong sense of place.

Faber, £16.99

Ironwood by Michael Connelly

A drug bust gone wrong and a long-buried disappearance collide on Catalina Island in the latest procedural from the bestselling author. As Detective Stilwell joins forces with Renée Ballard, Connelly delivers a tightly plotted mystery with plenty of mounting tension.

Orion, £22

Shrink Solves Murder by Philippa Perry

The psychotherapist and author of the bestselling The Book You Wish Your Parents Had Read turns her pen to fiction with this witty crime caper. Fittingly, the novel centres on a therapist – one who turns to sleuthing when a patient’s death doesn’t add up.

Hutchinson Heinemann, £18.99

Rules of Engagement by Tom Clancy; Death Under the Slovenian Sun by Georgina Stewart; A Very Dangerous Pursuit by Ben Miller

Rules of Engagement by Tom Clancy

A suspicious plane crash pulls President Jack Ryan into a web of global intrigue in the 27th instalment to Clancy’s bestselling series. With missing bodies and deception aplenty, you can rely on the author for a high-octane thriller.

Sphere, £25

Death Under the Slovenian Sun by Georgina Stewart

A glamorous coastal resort provides the backdrop for murder when a social media star is found dead on a drifting yacht. Detective Petra Vidmar must navigate a world of wealth and illusion in this sun-soaked, twisty summer read.

Constable, £22

A Very Dangerous Pursuit by Ben Miller

The comedian and actor recasts the protagonist of John Buchan’s spy classic The Thirty-Nine Steps in this rollicking historical adventure. From the Orient Express to the Titanic, it follows Richard Hannay on a globe-trotting chase involving espionage, intrigue and a mysteriously significant washbag.

HarperCollins, £20

Body of Lies by Jo Callaghan; Such a Nice Girl by Andrea Mara; Just Kill by Remi Kone

Body of Lies by Jo Callaghan

A murdered MP and a looming cyber attack propel this tense, tech-driven thriller. As DCS Kat Frank teams up with her partner – who just so happens to be the world’s first AI detective – the book smartly probes trust, truth and the uneasy future of policing.

Simon & Schuster, £18.99

Such a Nice Girl by Andrea Mara

When two young women vanish after a wedding, suspicion fractures a long-standing friendship. Given that Mara’s novel All Her Fault was recently adapted into a TV series starring Succession’s Sarah Snook, you know you can expect good things from her latest psychological thriller.

Bantam, £16.99

Just Kill by Remi Kone

Three mysterious cases across London – from a missing mother to a brutal murder – converge, and in turn reveal a conspiracy with global roots. Following last year’s propulsive Innocent Guilt, this is the second in Kone’s DI Leah Hutch series.

Quercus, £22

The Secrets from the Deep by Satu Rämö

The fourth entry to the Hildur series – which is being adapted for TV – sees a decades-old disappearance resurfacing in Iceland’s Westfjords. Interweaving timelines from 1995 and the present, it’s a chilling, slow-burn mystery steeped in Nordic atmosphere.

Zaffre, £9.99

The Hollow Boys by Tariq Ashkanani

10 months after he and his friend Will were presumed drowned, a bedraggled, silent Danny Yates walks back into his remote, dying town. Only when he finally speaks, he swears he is Will. A page-turning, unsettling read from the prize-winning author of The Midnight King.

Viper, £18.99

Britain is ungovernable – these numbers prove it

Keir Starmer has not been Prime Minister for two years, and yet he is at serious risk of being booted out of Downing Street by his own MPs in the wake of expected disastrous local election results , despite a landslide general election victory just 22 months ago.

If he does go, he will be the seventh Prime Minister in the UK in the last ten years, an extraordinary turnover. Margaret Thatcher, for example, was Prime Minister for more than 11 years (from 1979 to 1990) despite a difficult early start.

John Major lasted six, Tony Blair ten, and David Cameron six (Gordon Brown was just short of three years, but lost a general election at the end of Labour’s 13 year run).

Shorts – Quick stories

It’s not just Prime Ministers who are leading truncated political lives. Other posts at the summit of the British state have also seen high turnover in recent years as Britain, copes with a period of unprecedented political volatility.

There have been four cabinet secretaries – the head of the civil service – since the death of Sir Jeremy Heywood in 2018.

Between November 2020 and the resignation of Morgan McSweeney in February this year, eight people served as Downing Street chief of staff (the post is currently being shared by Vidhya Alakeson and Jill Cuthbertson).

‘It’s not a left/right thing’

The extraordinary turnover at a time when the UK seems to be struggling to solve so many problems – from boosting economic productivity and cutting the cost of living, to dealing with an ageing population and curbing illegal migration – has led people to ask whether the country has become “ungovernable”?

It is not the first time the question has been posed – the same refrain emerged during the political and economic turmoil of the 1970s. But pollsters say the current scale of public frustration and despondency about politics and the state of the country shouldn’t be underestimated.

Luke Tryl, the director of the More in Common think-tank, told The i Paper: “So many members of the public just think that the social contract is so broken.

“It’s not a left/right thing. They tend to think it’s broken in the same way – which is that you do the right thing, you do your bit, and you don’t get rewarded.

“If you’re on the left, you might be more likely to say ‘and billionaires are taking advantage of you’. On the right, you might be more likely to say ‘it’s migrants’.”

For Tryl, the political volatility we have seen in recent years is the result of that “pervasive sense that the system isn’t working, and politicians explicitly running against that system, but then being unable to deliver”.

He thinks that a tendency to duck difficult decisions over the last couple of decades – from replacing the UK’s nuclear plants to reforming the planning system – have compounded the situation.

“The reason we might be ungovernable is because people think we’ve been in a mess for so long, it’s now much harder to make those longer term, ‘jam tomorrow’ arguments to the public, because they think, ‘well, we’ve been told it’s just one more push for however many years, and it’s never gotten better’.”

Rise of 24-hour news and social media

Another factor widely blamed for our current political dysfunction is the profound changes which have taken place to the media landscape. The 24-hour news cycle and rise of social media have increased scrutiny of ministers and collapsed the time they have to take decisions.

Sir John Major, who was prime minister between 1990 and 1997, told the BBC earlier this month that the job is “certainly getting harder because of the external pressure of social media”.

Alex Thomas, an executive director at the Institute for Government think-tank, says that “information fragmentation and radically different ways of consuming facts, information, analysis and political messaging” represents a “huge shift” which politicians are still struggling to get to grips with.

Algorithm-driven social media has also played into a breakdown of traditional party loyalties among voters. Tim Bale, a professor of politics at Queen Mary University of London, thinks this has encouraged politicians to engage in a bidding war of unrealistic promises which has inevitably left people disappointed.

“Realising that they can no longer command such a large number of loyal voters, [politicians] are much more attuned than perhaps they used to be to the so-called ‘floating voter’ and giving them what they want,” he says.

“That sometimes has unfortunately encouraged politicians to make promises that they simply can’t keep.

“You have a sort of awful vicious cycle where you get a politician promising something which he or she can’t deliver, failing to deliver it, their party therefore getting restless and eventually replacing them, at which point the whole cycle starts again.”

Party discipline has been eroded

Social media has also eroded party discipline in Parliament. It has never been easier or more tempting for MPs to vent their frustrations to vast numbers of people. A smartphone allows even the most junior backbencher to curate a personal brand and build a following.

Bale says: “The number of rebellions has obviously increased over time. Social media means that people don’t have to serve the kind of apprenticeship that they used to, before they became sort of big names, big beasts in the party.

“It’s perfectly possible for somebody to make a name for themselves and as a result, be brought into government, simply because they are great on podcasts and have a good Twitter game.

“Jacob Rees-Mogg is a very good example of that, someone who traditionally would have been completely ignored and thought unsuitable… becomes a darling of the [Tory] party on social media.”

“It’s possible for people to become sort of ‘legends in their own lunchtime’.”

For Bale, another factor contributing to political volatility is the power which has been handed to party activists. “In both the Labour and Conservative parties, it’s their grassroots members rather than their MPs who have the final say in leadership contests, which means more people getting elected who aren’t backed by a convincing majority of their parliamentary colleagues.

“Given that’s the case, it’s not entirely surprising that when and if things start to go wrong, moves to unseat them – some of them ultimately successful – begin far sooner than they used to.”

Brexit referendum and unforced errors

If these are the volatile ingredients of “ungovernable Britain” – ducked challenges, information fragmentation, voter fragmentation, declining party discipline – then Brexit was the event which caused them to seriously combust.

It destroyed the premierships of David Cameron and Theresa May. The divisions it left in the Conservative Party – and the taste which Tory MPs acquired for political blood – finished off Boris Johnson and Liz Truss. Given the challenges to Starmer’s authority, it appears the Parliamentary Labour Party may have picked up the taste too.

When it comes to Starmer’s own woes, the experts think that while he inherited a set of daunting structural challenges, his problems are also partly of his own making.

Tryl says: “When this government came in it made a series early political mistakes. And had it not, I think we might be in a different place.”

The two key elements of Labour’s “change platform”, he argues, was a promise to “move on from Tory austerity” and to clean up politics after a series of scandals, the most damaging of which was Partygate.

But in a matter of a few months, Starmer blew public support on the former by making his “first big policy thing” cuts to winter fuel payments, which he had to U-turn on, and on the latter by becoming embroiled in the freebies controversy, when it emerged in 2024 he had received more free gifts and hospitality than any other MP since 2019. “We do have politicians making avoidable errors,” Tryl says.

He also made a series of poor decisions on personnel. While the appointment of Lord Peter Mandelson as US ambassador was the most disastrous, Tryl thinks that moving McSweeney from political strategist to No 10 chief of staff was also a mistake.

The appointment was just the latest in a long series of “bringing campaigners” into a role which also requires formidable administrative skills, he says. The last person to truly last in the role – Cameron’s chief of staff, Ed Llewellyn – was cut from very different cloth (after leaving No 10, he went on to be an ambassador and still works in the civil service under the current government).

Tryl is quick to point out that “you can’t just be an administrator”. “You’ve got to have that rare blend of being a political administrator,” he says. “There’s been too many round pegs in square holes.”

Thomas thinks that recent prime ministers have meanwhile not appreciated the importance of having a “strong cabinet secretary”. “The cabinet secretary is the person who brings together the apparatus of the state with the objectives of the Prime Minister,” he says.

“Political appointees have a really, really important role. But there’s something about a prime minister investing authority in a cabinet secretary who can then really crack heads together across the system.”

He thinks that the current incumbent, Dame Antonia Romeo, has made a confident start, but that there should also be a new “Prime Minister’s Department”. Staffed by a “small group of highly talented people”, this would provide a stronger centre to set direction for the rest of government.

Perhaps most importantly, prime ministers may need to start properly levelling with voters about the tough decisions and the trade-offs the country faces if Britain is to get out of its current rut.

Fear of making an argument

“There seems to be much more of a fear of making arguments,” Tryl says. The public respond well to arguments.

“I almost think our policy politicians have become too timid… at a time when people are crying out for authenticity.”

Bale agrees: “Sometimes voters behave like children, but that’s because they’re talked to like children. And if, perhaps, they were talked to like one adult to another, maybe they would be more prepared to hunker down for the long term.”

Thomas says: “It’s really important not to get into a kind of counsel of despair – ‘everything is awful, and it’s going to stay awful forever’.

“It’s really important to counter that mindset and to be conscious of what political leadership and vision can achieve.”

“Setting Britain on a democratically legitimate and more resilient trajectory is eminently achievable.”

Five fatal flaws in Trump’s latest plan to end the war

Donald Trump believes he is closing in on a framework to end nearly 10 weeks of war with Iran.

The President said the US had held “very good talks” with Iran over the past 24 hours and that it was “very possible that we’ll make a deal”, to end his increasingly problematic conflict.

“We’re in good shape,” he told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday, warning that if an agreement was not reached, “we’ll have to go a big step further” while insisting that Iran’s leaders “want to make a deal”.

The White House is hopeful that its 14-point memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Iranians will set a framework for more detailed talks on issues including Tehran’s nuclear programme, according to the US news outlet Axios.

The US expects Iran‘s response to the document over the next 48 hours. This is the closest the parties have been to an agreement since the war began on 28 February, the outlet reported, citing two US officials and two other sources briefed on the issue.

However, some major sticking points are still to be ironed out before a deal can be reached.

1. An ‘American wish-list’

The one-page proposal is being negotiated by Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner, who are speaking with Iranian officials directly and through Pakistani mediators.

The document in its current form declares an end to the war in the region and the start of a 30-day window for further negotiations on key points of difference, according to US media.

These include reopening the crucial Strait of Hormuz – which Iran has effectively closed to global shipping during the war, restrictions on Iran’s nuclear programme and the lifting of US sanctions.

TOPSHOT - US President Donald Trump participates in a Military Mother's Day Event in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on May 6, 2026. (Photo by Kent NISHIMURA / AFP via Getty Images)
Donald Trump says progress towards a deal is being made, but Iran’s speaker warned that ‘Operation Trust Me Bro failed’ (Photo: Kent Nishimura / AFP via Getty Images)

During that 30-day period, Iran’s control over the oil route as well as the US naval blockade of Iranian ports would be gradually lifted, according to a US official cited by Axios. Were talks to collapse, US forces could reimpose the blockade or resume military action against the country, the official added.

Under the deal, Iran would commit to a moratorium on nuclear enrichment, which could be around 12 to 15 years, a compromise between US demands for 20 years and Iran’s proposed five years. Highly enriched material would be handed over. In return, the US would agree to lift sanctions on Iran, which have played a role in the strangulation of the country’s economy, and release billions in frozen Iranian funds.

Despite Trump’s optimism, Iran has made it clear that the proposal as it stands is unacceptable, with state-aligned Fars news agency saying Axios‘s report contained “ambitious and unrealistic proposals”.

Iran’s parliament speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf appeared to mock reports that the two sides were ‌close, writing that “Operation Trust Me Bro failed”, while Ebrahim Rezaei, a spokesman for parliament’s powerful foreign policy and national security committee, called the proposal “more of an American wish-list than a reality”.

2. Deal postpones trickiest issues

Even if the US and Iran agree to this proposal, it is still merely a framework that postpones difficult discussions on issues where both sides’ positions are still far apart. Many of the terms are contingent on a final agreement, leaving the possibility of renewed war or an extended period of limbo.

“The real problem is less substance than sequencing, timelines and thresholds,” according to Dr Andreas Krieg, senior lecturer at the School of Security Studies at King’s College London. “Who moves first? How quickly are sanctions eased? At what point does Iran loosen its pressure on shipping? What does the US need to see before it winds down military pressure? These are the practical questions where there is a stalemate at the moment. Hence, why the administration is favouring an MOU rather than a deal.”

However, he emphasised that both sides were motivated to find a way to avoid going back to a hot war. “Trump needs to be able to claim that pressure worked. Iran needs to be able to say that it resisted coercion and extracted concessions. That creates space for a limited deal, especially if it is framed as a phased process rather than a grand bargain,” he told The i Paper.

3. The US is back where it started – only weaker

Even if an initial agreement is reached, the reality is that the US is back exactly where it was on 27 February, only this time with less leverage.

Trump has not managed to bring the Iranian regime to heel after weeks of bombardment. Instead, Iran has asserted control over a vital waterway and is holding the global economy to ransom, prompting spiralling energy prices that could send economies into recession – and which are harming Trump’s popularity with American voters back in the US.

“This essentially brings us back to the type of negotiations that were taking place prior to this war, and prior to last June’s war, except now including the issue of Strait alongside the nuclear issue,” said Dr Julie Norman, associate professor in politics and international relations at University College London.

“Regarding the Strait, the idea is that both parties will gradually lift their respective restrictions — but Iran may still seek de facto control over the waterway, and has demonstrated that they can weaponise it at will.”

Trump has threatened renewed violence if Iran does not agree to the deal, warning on Truth Social: “The bombing starts, and it will be, sadly, at a much higher level and intensity than it was before”.

Trump’s threats “suggest that Trump himself needs an exit”, according to Dr Krieg. “Trump’s threats reveal urgency in Washington. Trump wants to end the war, but he wants to end it in a way that looks like victory. Iran knows this. Tehran will therefore try to maximise pressure until the last possible moment because it wants a deal that serves its own narrative: not capitulation under American bombing, but perseverance that forced Washington back to the table.”

Trump’s willingness to resume a hot war looks increasingly questionable, as Iran will have noticed. The President has already backed down on numerous threats to resume bombing, and has extended an initial two-week ceasefire.

“Both parties see themselves holding the advantage,” said Dr Norman. “Iran is prepared to endure a lot of economic pain and refuses to be seen as capitulating to the US. Trump on the other hand is eager for a quick deal to get out of an unpopular war that is driving up costs at home.”

Vali Nasr, a former senior US presidential adviser and now Majid Khadduri Professor of Middle East Studies at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies, said it was “likely that the administration is claiming these maximal gains as political cover to end the war without achieving any of the objectives that it was after when the war started.

“Now its goal is to end the war and solve a problem that did not exist before the war: the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. There could be an agreement to formally end the war and lift both blockades and then announcement of 30 days to negotiate which will be extended and extended. The war ends and then the nuclear issue could go on and on for a long time to come.”

4. Notable omissions

There are also crucial omissions from the proposal. Among key demands Washington has made previously are restrictions of Iran’s ballistic ​missile programme and an end to its support for proxy militias in the Middle East.

The United States military says it has imposed significant damage on Iran, destroying much of its navy and air force, its missile programme, and its defence industrial base.

Iran has consistently opposed any limitations on its missile programme or its proxies, which are a central weapon in how it projects power and influence across the region, particularly against Israel and notably through Hezbollah in Lebanon.

However, Trump earlier this week appeared to walk back on his previous stance regarding Iran’s missile programme and proxies in an interview with a conservative radio host.

Asked if it was a red line to cap Iran’s missile programme, Trump said, “Look, missiles are bad, but yeah, and they do have to cap it, but this is about they cannot have a nuclear weapon,” suggesting that Iran was entitled not to have fewer missiles than its Arab neighbours.

Pressed on the proxy issue, Trump dodged the question, claiming that Iran was currently unable to support them because of the damage inflicted by the war. Israel is reportedly concerned by lack of attention paid to the ballistic missile programme, according to Channel 12.

5. The nuclear problem

Trump has repeatedly said the main reason for launching his war was to force Iran into restricting its nuclear programme, claiming that the regime had been close to building a nuclear weapon.

As well as the enrichment moratorium, the US is also reportedly demanding the dismantling of nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, a ban on underground nuclear work, on-demand inspections with penalties for violations, attestation Iran does not seek a nuclear weapon.

Trump claimed on Wednesday that Iran had agreed not to have a nuclear weapon. “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, and they won’t, and they’ve agreed to that, among other things.”

There is as yet no proof that Iran has agreed to any such thing. Iran has repeatedly said that it has the right to a nuclear programme.

Trump withdrew the US from the 2015 JCPOA deal on the nuclear programme spearheaded by Barack Obama, under which Iran agreed to limit uranium enrichment for 15 years and cap its stockpile. Trump repeatedly criticised that deal, claiming he can reach a better one – so he will need to be able to sell that to the US public and the world if he does secure a deal.

Analysts are sceptical of whether he can surpass the 2015 deal. “Regarding the nuclear element, at best we can expect to see something like the JCPOA — an agreement by Iran to suspend uranium enrichment and remove existing highly enriched uranium. Trump famously tore up that deal and is still pushing for more, but he’s unlikely to get it,” said Dr Norman.

The US also appears to be pressuring Iran to hand over its existing stockpile of more than 400kg of near-weapons-grade uranium. One source told Axios that one option could be moving the material to the US.

Reports suggest Iran is highly unlikely to agree to such a thing. The proposal contributed to the breakdown of Vice President JD Vance’s talks with the Iranians in Pakistan last month, a regional source, told CNN. One option could be sending it to a third country trusted by Iran.

According to Axios, the US also wants to insert a provision whereby any Iranian violation on enrichment would prolong the moratorium.

Dr Krieg, however, was more optimistic about the nuclear file, pointing out that much of the conceptual work had already been done. “The issues are difficult, but they are not new,” he said. “Enrichment limits, inspection mechanisms, stockpile management and time-bound restrictions have all been discussed before, including in February and earlier rounds. There is a roadmap to compromise if both sides want one. Even on missiles, sanctions relief and Iran’s regional networks, including the Axis of Resistance, there is more room for manoeuvre than the public rhetoric suggests. None of this is easy, but these are negotiable questions if the political decision has been made to de-escalate.”

I was Trump’s ambassador. You might not think it, but he always has a plan

Carla Sands began her career as a chiropractor, socialite and actor before succeeding her husband as CEO of investment firm Vintage Capital Group. In 2016, she met presidential candidate Donald Trump and became a fundraiser for his campaign.

Sands, who went on to become Trump’s ambassador to Denmark during his first term, introduced the businessman to movers and shakers, some of whom she says still work for the President today.

“I remember saying to friends, ‘I think this Donald Trump, I think he’s got it’. And people would say to me, you can’t be serious. And I would say, ‘You need to get ready for a Donald Trump presidency,’” Sands recalls.

Shorts – Quick stories

The 65-year-old, who donated nearly a quarter of a million dollars to that campaign, says that Trump is a great communicator. “Maybe the best communicator our country has ever had. I mean, Abraham Lincoln wrote some beautiful speeches, but President Trump understands communication in the 21st century. He’s really mastered it.

“Plus, he’s a successful businessman, so he understands how to negotiate, [while] most US presidents are political animals.”

And despite Trump’s attacks on his allies raising eyebrows and pulses around the world, Sands insists there is method to his insults.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (L) is greeted by US Ambassador to Denmark Carla Sands after he landed at Kastrup airport in Copenhagen, Denmark on July 22, 2020. - A year after the US and Denmark butted heads over President Donald Trump's offer to buy Greenland, his secretary of state is visiting the Nordic country on July 22, 2020, with Arctic issues at the top of the agenda. (Photo by Thibault SAVARY / various sources / AFP) (Photo by THIBAULT SAVARY/AFP via Getty Images)
Then-ambassador Sands with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in Copenhagen, Denmark, on 22 July 2020 (Photo: Thibault Savary/AFP via Getty Images)

When, earlier this year, Trump disparaged the sacrifice of Nato troops who fought with the US in Afghanistan, Sands admits she felt wounded. “I felt bad for the Danish troops who had a higher per capita loss than the US and the UK troops,” she says.

But she adds: “You have to look at President Trump as a macro guy — he’s looking at the whole world. All he knows are the top line numbers.”

Over the weekend, the Pentagon announced that the US would withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany over the next year, just days after German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the US was being “humiliated” by Iran. Trump warned this was just the beginning.

Sands, who served on Trump’s Transition Finance Committee and Economic Advisory Council in 2016, and took up diplomatic reins as Ambassador to Denmark in 2017, says that Trump “doesn’t know the details, but he does know the big picture that most Nato allies were not standing with us”.

“Think about what he’s dealing with,” she adds. “He’s dealing with our economy, he’s dealing with the inner social issues in the United States, and then he’s dealing with the world… We have to look at the big picture.”

COPENHAGEN, DENMARK - SEPTEMBER 17: Carla Sands, Ambassador of the United States of America, seen at the official inauguration of the Australian War Monument at the Churchill Memorial Park on September 17, 2020 in Copenhagen, Denmark. The monument commemorates Australian service personnel who lost their lives in Denmark during both the First and Second World Wars. The memorial was developed and funded by the Australian Embassy in Copenhagen with the assistance of a grant from the Australian Department of Veterans Affairs. Also present at the ceremony was representatives at embassies from USA, Germany, New Zealand, Canada, United Kingdom and France. (Photo by Ole Jensen/Getty Images)
The 65-year-old, pictured at the inauguration of the Australian War Memorial in Copenhagen in 2020, says Donald Trump’s policies are ‘the best in my country’s history’ (Photo: Ole Jensen/Getty Images)

Sands – who was a candidate in the Republican primary in Pennsylvania’s 2022 senate election – says she admires Trump’s capacity to deal with all of this, “because most US presidents, they can get one or two big things done in a year”.

Right now, Trump’s deal-making abilities are being questioned. He had to retreat from threats and offers to buy Greenland from Denmark last year, and his strongarm attempts to resolve the war he launched against Iran in late February have so far come to nothing.

Polls show Trump with his highest-ever disapproval rating, of 62 per cent. When it comes to the war with Iran, 66 per cent of Americans polled say they disapprove.

Even so, unlike former Trump allies and Maga influencers such as Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly and Marjorie Taylor-Green, who have condemned the conflict – accusing Trump of going against his promises not to get involved in forever wars – Sands, who now chairs the Foreign Policy Initiative at the Trump-aligned think tank America First Policy Institute, continues to back him.

AUVERS-SUR-OISE, FRANCE - 2026/02/21: Former U.S. Ambassador Carla Sands addresses delegates, rejecting monarchy-era narratives and asserting that dictatorship, whether crowned or turbaned, cannot provide gender equality, while backing a secular democratic republic. Iranian opposition figures and international delegates gathered for an International Women's Day 2026 conference to emphasize women's leadership as the central pillar of democratic transition in Iran. Speakers endorsed the NCRI Ten-Point Plan, highlighted the role of women-led Resistance Units, and rejected both clerical rule and any return to monarchy, framing women's political leadership as the litmus test for a future secular and democratic republic. (Photo by Siavosh Hosseini/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Sands, who now chairs the Foreign Policy Initiative at Trump-aligned think tank America First Policy Institute, says the President ‘doesn’t know the details, but he does know the big picture’ regarding Nato (Photo: Siavosh Hosseini/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

She says it was Iran, not Trump, that started the war when the Islamic Republic overthrew the monarchy in 1979, and that the President is acting consistently with the man she met a decade ago.

“He’s talked about all the issues he’s dealing with today, for decades. He was talking about Kharg Island in 1988,” she said, referring to Iran’s island oil export hub that Trump threatened to seize by force in March.

The businesswoman, who has served on boards including the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art and the Los Angeles Philharmonic, says Trump is someone who has “watched these issues, who understands the geopolitics of all these issues, and he has a firm grasp on everything”.

Even his social media posts threatening to wipe out the Iranian civilisation fit this brief, according to Sands, who says Trump’s communication style is sometimes intended for a specific audience. “In this case, he’s messaging straight to the despots in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps that are literally mowing down citizens of Iran,” she says.

US President Donald Trump meets with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on March 3, 2026. Chancellor Merz is the first European leader to visit President Trump since the United States and Israel launched their war against Iran. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP via Getty Images)
Trump with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office in March. Relations between the two leaders have gone downhill from there (Photo: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP)

Sands adds that every US President since 1979 has said: “We will not let Iran get a nuclear weapon. We will not let Iran get a nuclear weapon. But they all punted.”

She says she remains optimistic that there are “good people” working on the ground in Iran to create a “good and beneficial government”, pointing to a recent meeting she had with the National Council of Resistance of Iran.

Sands also said the failure of the US’s Nato allies to back Trump’s war and get involved would not be forgotten. “Two years ago, I would’ve said ‘Yes, Article Five is ironclad [but] they said no when President Trump asked them to help open the Strait [of Hormuz],’” she said.

When it comes to Denmark, Sands says the European country has never been able to defend Greenland and has never attempted to develop it.

“Greenland languishes like a welfare state on just enough to keep it going, but not enough to develop economically,” she said. “The EU is now really investing a lot more than they ever have into Greenland. Part of that, I think, is to counter President Trump in the United States. But what’s going to happen is Greenland will go independent in this century,” she predicted.

Ultimately, Sands believes, Trump is what the planet needs right now.

“The fact is, the world needs a strong, virtuous US president,” she said. “You could say, ‘Well, Donald Trump’s not virtuous’. His policies are, so I don’t look at the man… We are all flawed, all of us, whether we’re followers or leaders, sinners and saints, but his policies are the best in my country’s history.”

I’ve got a heat pump and solar panels

A homeowner who has invested in solar panels, a heat pump and an electric car to help avoid soaring energy and fuel bills has said he is saving more than £1,000 a year.

Charlie Dearman started thinking about getting off the gas grid following the “shock” of the energy crisis following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

He’s now installed solar panels, a battery and a heat pump in his east London home and reduced his monthly energy bill to £65 per month.

Shorts – Quick stories

Here’s how his costs have broken down:

Solar

Dearman lives in a 1930s terraced property in Walthamstow. Two years ago he approached neighbours to see if he could convince others to get solar panels, the idea being that they could get a discount from an installer.

“My initial idea was it’s all well and good doing something yourself for the climate, but obviously it’s got to scale. So I thought if you could get three people to do it with you and they inspire three more people then it rolls on like that,” he said.

A group of eight households on his street were able to obtain a discount from an installer, which brought the initial quote for solar panels and a battery on his home down from £10,000 to £7,000. The cost of the solar panels was £4,000 and the battery was £3,000.

Solar panels on the roof of Charlie Dearman’s home in Walthamstow

Dearman has calculated that the value of the energy produced by his solar panels last year was £784. This is a combination of the cash he saved by using solar power instead of buying from the grid, and the money he made selling energy back to the grid.

His household used 61 per cent of the energy it generated and sold the rest back to the grid at a price of 15p/kwh.

Based on this calculation, Dearman will pay off the upfront cost of the solar panels in just over five years.

Battery

Deciding to invest in a battery has “unlocked loads of value”, according to Dearman. Batteries can store the excess solar energy a household generates, which means it can be used at a later point, for example when it gets dark.

Dearman said many people are not aware that batteries can play another important function that is not related to solar: utilising a “time-of-use” tariff, which varies the cost of electricity based on the time of day.

With these tariffs it is typically cheaper to buy energy during off-peak times, such as overnight, or when there is an abundance of renewable energy in the grid, for example on sunny or windy days.

Dearman utilities his battery in the winter by charging it overnight and using the power during peak times. This means electricity costs him around 6p per unit, compared to an average of 25p per unit from the grid.

He also makes sure to charge his electric vehicle when electricity is cheap. Sometimes he even gets paid to use energy; this happens when there is more renewable energy available than the grid can handle.

“The other day it had been windy and sunny so the electricity price was negative. So I put our car on charge that afternoon and was basically paid £4 to charge the car, which is remarkable as a concept,” he said.

Heat pump

After installing solar and a battery, the natural next step for Dearman was a heat pump. He received a £7,500 grant from the Government, which brought the cost down to £5,000. As he was renovating his property and replacing an old boiler anyway, the investment made sense.

It cost him an average of £27 per month to heat his home using the heat pump last year, compared to an equivalent £80 per month on gas.

Dearman said one of the benefits of using a heat pump was that “you have a constantly perfect temperature inside” as they work most efficiently when they are set to run at a stable temperature at all times.

However, one of the downsides was that installation can be disruptive as most people will need to upgrade their radiators as part of the process.

But for Dearman it is worth no longer being at the whims of global fossil fuel prices. “They came and dug up the gas pipe, which was quite satisfying after our heat pump install,” he said.

I haven’t told my husband we have a cleaner

Having a cleaner was once something reserved for the rich, with many people unable to justify the expense. But now, with long working hours and greater demands on their time, many people are outsourcing their domestic tasks to professionals, allowing them to focus on work, family, or hobbies and freeing up weekends from chores. As of 2024–25, approximately 17 per cent of UK households employ a cleaner. Despite the cost of living crisis, the use of domestic cleaners has grown significantly, rising by around 70 per cent between 2018 and 2023.

We spoke to five Britons about how much they pay their cleaners and how the arrangement benefits everything from their mental health to relationships.

‘I pay £480 a month, but would get someone cheaper if they raised their price’

James, 44, who lives in a four-bedroom house in south London with his partner, five-year-old twins and a cat, pays £480 a month for two cleaners to work for four hours each week to tidy the house and deal with everything from recycling to laundry. He sees no issue with how much he spends on the service. “If the cleaners took a week off, the house would be an absolute disgrace, between the cat hair, crumbs and kids’ fingerprints everywhere. I don’t cut my own hair or fix my own car, so why would I have an issue with paying for professionals to do a better job at cleaning than I ever could?”

One cleaner focuses on washing and ironing laundry, which James sees as vital. He admits that he doesn’t know how to operate his own washing machine or tumble dryer. The hourly rate comes to £15, which James admits is low for the area. “I know people who pay a lot more than me, and if my cleaners put their prices up, I would look for someone cheaper, because cleaners are really easy to come by in London.”

‘Clutter makes me anxious, having a cleaner helps with stress’

Sarah, 49, who lives in North Yorkshire, pays £40 for a 2.5-hour weekly clean, and considers it vital to her wellbeing. “I am a single mum, working full time, and I suffer from anxiety,” she says. ”I view having a clean house as essential for my mental health. I can relax and breathe when I’m not surrounded by clutter.”

Sarah’s cleaner blitzes the kitchen, bathroom and bedrooms, then mops hard floors, hoovers, empties bins and changes bedding. She cycled through more than 10 cleaners before she found her current one three years ago, sacking previous cleaners who didn’t turn up on time, or left jobs half done.

“My current cleaner is one of the most valued people in my life. Last Christmas I gave her a £100 cash bonus because I want her to know how much I appreciate her. She’s now in her late fifties and talking about cutting back on jobs because she finds the work physically exhausting but I hope that by treating her well, she’ll want to keep me on as a client, because I don’t know what I’d do without her.”

‘A cleaner saved our marriage’

Fiona, 38, lives in Worcestershire with her husband Shane and pays £18 an hour for a cleaner to come round to their two-bedroom house every Sunday, and credits the three hours of weekly housework for saving her marriage. “I have ADHD, and my husband is a neat freak, which was always going to cause issues when we moved in together. We fought constantly for the first year of our marriage because no matter how much I tried to tidy up after myself, the house was always a mess,” she says. “During one fight, my husband threatened to leave me if I didn’t unload the dishwasher at least once. We thought about going to marriage counselling, but a friend suggested we get a cleaner instead.”

Fiona credits the cleaner with not only helping her relationship – noting that the couple barely fight now – but also with alleviating the task overwhelm she often feels. “Before we hired the cleaner, I felt a lot of shame about the mess I lived in,” she says. “When I got back from holiday, my suitcase used to lie for weeks before I unpacked it, but now, the cleaner helps me sort it into piles and deals with the laundry right away rather than let it sit in a corner gathering dust.”

‘I have a secret cleaner’

Annie, 33, from Manchester, blames working-class guilt for lying to her husband about employing a cleaner two years ago. “When we got together, my husband talked about getting a cleaner because we both work out of the house five days a week, but I told him I could never employ one, because my mum was a cleaner and it would feel wrong. I insisted that I’d clean the flat myself, despite the fact I loathe cleaning.”

It took a year for Annie to crack and employ someone to come once a fortnight to help out, at £14 an hour. “I told my husband that the £56 that comes out of the bank account every month is for Pilates classes, and he’s never questioned it. I know it’s stupid, but I am too proud to admit I was in the wrong. Oddly, my husband has never picked up on the fact that the house is cleaned to a much higher standard than I could ever manage, or that our bed linen is now ironed. I caught the cleaner hoovering the top of our books once, which I thought was a bit much, but I’m so glad to have her.”

‘I gave up takeaways to keep my cleaner’

Rhiannon, 37, from Glasgow used to pay minimum wage for a cleaner and now pays £20 an hour and truly believes you get what you pay for. “When I paid £10 an hour, I had a series of unreliable cleaners. One lost the spare keys to my house, meaning I had to spend over £100 to change the locks. There was a lack of attention to detail, and the work always seemed to be rushed. I realised the low wage was attracting a poor quality of work, so I asked for recommendations from friends, and the best cleaner I’ve ever had turned out to be the most expensive.”

Rhiannon’s cleaner comes round for two hours a week, and she admits that she gave up other luxuries to be able to afford her. “I used to love eating out or getting a big takeaway at the weekend, but with the cost of living rising, I just can’t justify it anymore. But I won’t give up my cleaner. The service she provides isn’t just cleaning; she’s giving me back my time. I love that when I come home on a Friday night, I know the house will look and smell amazing, and my bedding will be fresh. It’s the best night’s sleep I get all week.”

‘I can’t afford my cleaner’

Sarah*, 46 and based in East Sussex, has had a cleaner for 10 years. “I can’t really afford a cleaner but I am so rubbish at doing it myself that I want to hang on for as long as I can. I know that it’s a luxury most people have given up, so I tend to keep quiet about it amongst my friends,” she says. “That said, I do work longer hours than most of the other mothers I know. Funnily enough, cleaners have never come up in conversation with any of the dads.”

A decade ago, Sarah was paying £8 an hour. “That rose quickly over the years, until I recently found myself paying £25. I have now found someone for £19.50, though I know she is charging my friend £17,” she says. “I am supposed to have her booked for four hours a fortnight, so it would be around £156 a month, but she is always rushing off somewhere else so I don’t get the full four hours, which means I’m happy to pay less.

“She will do different tasks if and when asked, such as changing the bedding or doing the skirting or windows. But of course I hate asking.”

*Name changed

I’m a GP but I wasn’t ready for the terror I felt waiting for my own scan results

Every time my phone rang last week, my stomach dropped. A ringtone, a withheld number, the buzz of a text message, and suddenly my heart was racing before I’d even looked at the screen. Rationally, I knew it could be anyone. Emotionally, I was bracing for bad news.

This is scanxiety: the very real distress before, during or after medical scans and tests. It is the knot in your stomach while waiting for an MRI. The dread that arrives with a CT appointment letter. The inability to concentrate when blood test results sit somewhere in an inbox. The way a normal Tuesday can feel impossible because you are waiting for someone, somewhere, to tell you whether life is about to change.

As a GP, I’ve heard patients describe this feeling for years. I knew people struggled to sleep, became tearful, snappy and distracted. But since my own cancer diagnosis last year, I have come to understand scanxiety in a far deeper way.

People often assume the hardest day is diagnosis day, and of course, that day can split your life into a before and after. But what nobody really prepares you for is how long fear can linger after treatment ends. There is an expectation that once the surgery is over, the radiotherapy finishes, the medication starts, you should feel grateful and move on.

Sometimes you do feel grateful. But you can also feel frightened, and that’s OK.

Follow-up scans, check-ups and surveillance appointments can re-open emotions you thought you had neatly packed away. You may be back at work, making packed lunches, replying to emails, remembering PE kits and pretending to listen when your child tells you a 15-minute story about Minecraft. But underneath it all, your mind is waiting for the phone to ring.

If you have previously received difficult news in a hospital room or over the phone, your body remembers that experience. Through trauma, the nervous system learns that certain places, sounds and situations are associated with danger. So you find yourself in a perfectly ordinary kitchen, reacting as if there is a threat in the room.

This is why telling anxious people to “just relax” is about as useful as telling someone with hayfever to “just stop sneezing”. Well-meaning loved ones often say: “Think positive” or “I’m sure it’ll be fine.” We hate seeing the people we love in pain and want to lift it somehow, but the truth is that often, the only reassurance you really want is the result itself.

Others may suggest speaking to people who have been through something similar. Sometimes that helps enormously because shared experience can be comforting and connective. But it can also backfire – when you are already frightened, hearing another horror story can send your mind into a tailspin.

In calmer moments, the internet can be useful. In anxious moments, it can feel like psychological warfare. Your nervous system is on high alert, scanning for danger, so suddenly every headline, every health story, every algorithmically served advert appears to be speaking directly to your fears. You begin to wonder if your phone is listening, when really it is anxiety making everything feel loaded.

So what helps? I wish I could offer a magic solution. However, there are some practical things that can help.

Ask your referring clinician for a plan: when will results likely be back? How will I hear? Who do I contact if I’ve heard nothing? Even a little certainty can soften the edges of worry.

Tell healthcare staff if you are struggling. You do not need to perform bravery. Radiographers, nurses, receptionists and doctors see this every day and can be gentler than you expect.

Write things down – questions, worries, dates, symptoms, practical tasks. Anxiety loves clutter. Putting thoughts on paper can stop them from endlessly circling.

Choose your distractions wisely. Doomscrolling is not rest. Fresh air, movement, a walk around the block, watching something comforting, sitting beside someone safe – these often help more than another hour online.

If it feels overwhelming, speak to your GP. Anxiety around health can be severe and deserves support just like any other health issue. Most of all, I think people need permission to stop minimising it. Scanxiety is a deeply human response to uncertainty, especially when you have known fear before.

As a GP, I still request scans for patients every week. But being on the other side has changed me. I am slower with my words now. Softer with reassurance. More mindful that the period between “we’ll send you for a scan” and “everything looks OK” can contain an enormous amount of suffering.

So if you are waiting right now for a letter, a call, a message, an appointment, I hope you know this: you are not overreacting. You are carrying something very heavy. And you are not alone.

Trump’s ballroom is turning into a toxic fortress

The cost of Donald Trump’s White House ballroom is set to rise significantly after Republicans inserted $1bn (£735m) for East Wing security enhancements into an immigration enforcement funding bill this week, despite the President’s repeated claims that the ballroom would be funded through private donations.

Trump has previously insisted that the main reason for his grandiose project, previously expected to cost around $400m (£294m), is to enhance White House security, saying that “the ballroom essentially becomes a shed for what’s being built under [it]”.

However, many see its construction as a further attempt by Trump to imprint his own vision onto the landscape of Washington DC. Trump is also pushing forward with plans to erect a 250ft triumphal arch that would stand out across the city’s skyline.

Shorts – Quick stories

While specific details on the new East Wing security measures are scant, the President has previously said that the compound beneath the ballroom would include bulletproof glass, drone-proof roofing, bomb shelters, hardened telecommunications, a secure HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) system and “very major medical facilities”.

However, the project is facing a series of challenges, including legal ones and widespread unpopularity. A recent report from the National Park Service also found that toxic debris from the demolition of the previous East Wing had been dumped at a nearby public golf course.

A new injection of funds for Trump’s ‘vanity project’

The requested funding for security enhancements came as part of a roughly $70bn (£51bn) package to bolster spending on immigration enforcement and border patrols.

While the bill did not explicitly mention the ballroom, it stated the money would be used for “security adjustments and upgrades, including within the perimeter fence of the White House compound to support enhancements by the Secret Service relating to the East Wing Modernization Project, including above-ground and below-ground security features”.

It barred any of the money being spent on “non-security elements”.

Even so, this seems to go against Trump’s previous claim that “not one penny is being used from the federal government” to build his ballroom.

A Washington Post-ABC News poll from last week showed that Americans opposed the East Wing demolition and new ballroom project by a margin of 56 per cent to 28 per cent.

A model of the White House with the planned ballroom extension during a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Mark Rutte, secretary general of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), not pictured, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2025. Trump said he planned to speak to Xi Jinping about China's purchases of Russian oil when the two leaders meet next week in South Korea, after the US president on Wednesday announced fresh sanctions on top energy companies with ties to the Kremlin. Photographer: Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Donald Trump’s reimagining of the White House has become a divisive issue in the United States (Photo: Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg/Getty Images)

“At a time when Americans are really feeling the pinch because of the events in the Middle East and the affordability crisis that already existed, I think a lot of people will be questioning whether this is a billion dollars well spent,” Andrew Moran, a professor of politics and international relations at the London Metropolitan University, told The i Paper.

Trump and Republicans have tried to use last month’s shooting at the White House press correspondents’ dinner, where the President and many of his cabinet were in attendance, to further justify the project. Trump posted on Truth Social after the shooting that it would “never have happened” had his new ballroom already been built. A White House spokesperson said the ballroom was “long overdue”.

But Moran said that the ballroom is “in the end a vanity project… Trump is somebody who is desperate to leave a legacy”.

What the ballroom bunker could defend against

Trump has detailed some of the defences that the ballroom bunker could offer, and Moran said that “the billion-dollar price tag would suggest that it’s quite a significant bunker and I would assume that this would be designed to withstand nuclear attacks. The fact that there are medical facilities would suggest it is something that you would be able to stay in for a while”.

Moran added that conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine have highlighted the damage drones can cause and how they are able to evade traditional defences. “With drone technology advancing so quickly, I would think there would be concerns about a drone attack on facilities in the US such as the White House.”

He also pointed to the threat of cyber attacks. “If a massive cyber attack was launched on the infrastructure in Washington DC, you’d have to coordinate a response to that from a bunker because a massive cyberattack could bring all kinds of problems on the streets.”

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 28: An excavator sits on the rubble after the East Wing of the White House was demolished on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC. The demolition is part of U.S. President Donald Trump's plan to build a ballroom on the eastern side of the White House. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Donald Trump tore down the previous East Wing last year to make way for his ballroom project (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Delays in the building process

Despite the strong push from Trump, construction on the project has been halted multiple times. In April, a judge ruled that lawmakers must authorise the project before it could continue, after the President tried to circumvent a previous court order by redefining the ballroom as a critical national security upgrade.

By rolling the new funding into the wider immigration spending bill, Moran said that “it will possibly be a way of getting around the decision that was made by Judge [Richard] Leon”.

However, Democrats have responded to the development, signalling that they intend to make the ballroom the centre of their opposition to the funding bill. Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader, said on social media: “Republicans looked at families drowning in bills and decided what they really needed was more raids and a Trump ballroom.”

Senate Democrats previously blocked funding for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency over the conduct of federal immigration officers, after the deaths of two protestors – Renee Good and Alex Pretti – in Minnesota this year.

But Republicans seem unperturbed by the opposition, with Charles E. Grassley, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, saying: “We will work to ensure this critical funding gets signed into law without unnecessary delay.”

The Hull City cult hero with ‘unfinished business’ in the Premier League

If fortune really does favour the brave then Oli McBurnie should be on the brink of the most remarkable promotion to the Premier League with Hull City.

This most interesting footballer, a throwback centre-forward who admits he wears “toddler’s shinpads” due to superstition and has a passion for travel, is certainly not afraid to take a risk. When he was 19 he nearly left Bradford City to join Freiburg, a move he had his heart set on after Googling Baden-Württemberg and thinking it looked “pretty picturesque”.

Two years ago he turned down a contract offer from Sheffield United to uproot his young family and join Las Palmas, learning Spanish within a few weeks and embracing life in the sun-kissed Canary Islands, where he became something of a cult hero.

Last summer he was at it again, taking another huge leap of faith to join Hull. The Tigers were a club under a transfer embargo, who had just appointed a little-known manager and were among the favourites for relegation. The general consensus when he signed: what on earth is he thinking?

Hull City felt different

“There were a few raised eyebrows, for sure, but I don’t like taking the safe option,” McBurnie tells The i Paper of his decision to join the Tigers over former club Sheffield United and a clutch of rival Championship clubs who were vying for his signature.

“But Hull felt a bit different. I like to do my due diligence and I had a few conversations – with [sporting director] Jared Dublin and (manager) Sergej Jakirovic. Acun [Ilicali] is also such an enthusiastic owner and that really came across but he wanted me to make a football decision, not an emotional one.

“He was almost sitting in the background until I signed, then when I made the decision he couldn’t do enough for me. Maybe you didn’t see it from the outside but I thought all the ingredients were there to be a successful team and successful club.”

HULL, ENGLAND - MAY 2: Oli McBurnie of Hull City as fans invade the pitch during the Sky Bet Championship match between Hull City and Norwich City at MKM Stadium on May 2, 2026 in Hull, England. (Photo by Freddie Yeo/MB Media/Getty Images)
Hull left it to the last day to reach the play-offs (Photo: Getty)

Nine months on McBurnie feels his hunch has been “vindicated”. Having over performed all season Hull regained their momentum to sneak back into the play-offs on a dramatic final day of the season that saw them leapfrog Wrexham and tee up a two-legged semi-final with Millwall. The club are the underdogs in the play-offs but are embracing it.

“I’d never thought of it this way but someone said to me the other day we were the only club who wanted to be in the play-offs on that final day,” McBurnie says.

“Millwall and Middlesbrough were playing for an outside chance of second, maybe that will have an impact, who knows? We’re all buzzing, there’s no fear, we’re just looking forward to it and I just think it’s going to be a special night, an ‘old school’ sort of Friday night game under the lights. It feels like whole city is up for it.”

Jakirovic gets it

Ilicali, the larger-than-life Turkish media mogul who bought the club four years ago, has driven the project and was in tears at the final whistle on Saturday. He came into the dressing room after the game and gave the players a memorable speech.

“He has promised a few things, yeah. He said to us ‘You will see how crazy I really am if we get promoted’ so I like the sound of that. I’d like to see what he means.”

If they’re going to do that, you’d think McBurnie will have a big say in it. His 17 goals – already two more than he promised Jakirovic when they first met – have played a huge part in Hull’s success but so too has their unheralded manager.

Hull City manager Sergej Jakirovic arrives ahead of the Sky Bet Championship match at the MKM Stadium, Hull. Picture date: Saturday April 18, 2026. PA Photo. Photo credit should read: Lee Keuneke/PA Wire. RESTRICTIONS: EDITORIAL USE ONLY No use with unauthorised audio, video, data, fixture lists, club/league logos or
Jakirovic is one of the Championship’s most adaptable managers (Photo: PA)

In an era of bosses hung up on projects and philosophies, McBurnie believes he “gets” the Championship as well as any manager he has played under.

“One of the best things I can say about the manager is his adaptability. It’s not kind of his way or the highway, it’s not a dictatorship. He’s not stubborn like a lot of managers typically are and I think that’s been one of the reasons we’ve done so well this year,” he explains.

“It’s probably hard to game plan us against us because we play so many different ways against different teams.

“It’s been brilliant for me – the manager’s giving me the freedom to go out and play how I want to play and kind of making the game plan about getting balls in the box.”

World Cup hopes

Mystifyingly it has not been enough to turn the head of Steve Clarke which is why McBurnie’s second aim this season – to get into Scotland’s World Cup plans – is likely to evade him.

“I’m happy with my efforts. I have done all I can and ultimately it’s the manager’s decision. I have to respect whichever way he goes,” he says.

McBurnie’s other frustration is that he is regarded by some as belonging to the category of forwards who are too good for the Championship but not good enough for the Premier League. Nonsense, he insists.

Read more

“I think I’ve got nearly 100 Premier League games now, probably nearly half of my footballing career has been in the Premier League,” he says.

“The last two out of the three seasons when I was top scorer for Sheffield United [that was] in the Premier League and the last year that I was there was really hampered by injuries.

“I think I had maybe six goals, four assists but I only started 14 games or something due to injuries and a couple of suspensions, which might be my own fault.

“From that I’ve always felt like I could compete at the top level. I do feel like I’ve got unfinished business in the Premier League.”